RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. ETLNX (196M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than ETLNX: RWMFX (1.42) vs ETLNX (0.16). ETLNX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: ETLNX (4 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). ETLNX (1.33) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). ETLNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETLNX: RWMFX (250) vs ETLNX (1000). ETLNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.83 vs. RWMFX (7.01).

	ETLNX	RWMFX	ETLNX / RWMFX
Total Expense Ratio	1.14	0.31	368%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio	1.33	0.31	429%
Fund Existence	4 years	24 years	-
Gain YTD	9.552	5.018	190%
Front Load	N/A	N/A	-
Min. Initial Investment	1000	250	400%
Min. Initial Investment IRA	N/A	N/A	-
Net Assets	196M	219B	0%
Annual Yield % from dividends	0.16	1.42	11%
Returns for 1 year	8.83	7.01	126%
Returns for 3 years	42.12	28.01	150%
Returns for 5 years	N/A	28.79	-
Returns for 10 years	N/A	80.69	-

View a ticker or compare two or three

Ask AI

Compare

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

MFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
BCEMX	33.34	0.31	+0.94%
Boston Common ESG Impact Em Mkts
FSENX	85.94	0.70	+0.82%
Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio
BIAUX	32.33	0.06	+0.19%
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fdmtl Val Inv
GSIMX	24.30	N/A	N/A
Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps Instl
HSCCX	3.10	-0.01	-0.32%
Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth C