Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETNCX vs HULFX
ETNCX vs HULFX Comparison
Open Charts ETNCX vs HULFX
Eaton Vance NC Municipal Income A
Price$8.44
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.93M
Hawaiian Tax-Free Trust F
Price$10.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets380.45M
ETNCX vs HULFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETNCX vs. HULFX commentary
Nov 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETNCX is a Hold and HULFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HULFX has more cash in the bank: 380M vs. ETNCX (245M). ETNCX pays higher dividends than HULFX: ETNCX (3.21) vs HULFX (2.61). ETNCX was incepted earlier than HULFX: ETNCX (32 years) vs HULFX (7 years). HULFX (0.76) is less costly to investors than ETNCX (0.70). ETNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. HULFX (18.00). HULFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETNCX: HULFX (0) vs ETNCX (1000). HULFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.09 vs. ETNCX (2.68). HULFX return over 5 years is better than : 1.70 vs. ETNCX (0.78).
| ETNCX | HULFX | ETNCX / HULFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.76 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.76 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.354 | 3.607 | 93% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 245M | 380M | 64% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.21 | 2.61 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.68 | 3.09 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.57 | 9.06 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.78 | 1.70 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.36 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers