Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETNCX vs HULFX
ETNCX vs HULFX Comparison
Open Charts ETNCX vs HULFX
Eaton Vance NC Municipal Income A
Price$8.39
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets239.41M
Hawaiian Tax-Free Trust F
Price$10.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets383.8M
ETNCX vs HULFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETNCX vs. HULFX commentary
Oct 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETNCX is a Hold and HULFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HULFX has more cash in the bank: 384M vs. ETNCX (239M). ETNCX pays higher dividends than HULFX: ETNCX (2.98) vs HULFX (2.57). ETNCX was incepted earlier than HULFX: ETNCX (32 years) vs HULFX (7 years). HULFX (0.76) is less costly to investors than ETNCX (0.70). ETNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. HULFX (18.00). HULFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETNCX: HULFX (0) vs ETNCX (1000). HULFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.54 vs. ETNCX (2.08). HULFX return over 5 years is better than : 1.76 vs. ETNCX (1.12).
| ETNCX | HULFX | ETNCX / HULFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.76 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.76 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.472 | 3.041 | 81% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 239M | 384M | 62% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.98 | 2.57 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.08 | 2.54 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.37 | 10.33 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.12 | 1.76 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.58 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement