EWA
Price
$28.56
Change
-$0.09 (-0.31%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Net Assets
1.45B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
EWY
Price
$219.20
Change
+$14.12 (+6.89%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Net Assets
26.26B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EWA vs EWY

EWA vs EWY Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares MSCI Australia ETF (EWA) vs. iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY)

Key Takeaways

  • iShares MSCI Australia ETF (EWA) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) are both single-country equity ETFs from iShares that provide targeted exposure to developed and emerging Asian-Pacific markets, respectively, without direct competition in the same geography.
  • EWA tracks the MSCI Australia Index with approximately 46 holdings concentrated in financials and materials, while EWY follows the MSCI Korea 25/50 Index with roughly 81 holdings dominated by technology and consumer discretionary sectors.
  • EWA maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.50% compared to EWY’s 0.59%, offering a modest cost advantage for long-term investors seeking broad Australian market access.
  • EWA’s sector allocation emphasizes financial services and mining, reflecting Australia’s commodity-driven economy, whereas EWY delivers heavy exposure to semiconductors and electronics, aligning with South Korea’s technology export focus.
  • Both funds employ passive, market-capitalization-weighted strategies with periodic rebalancing aligned to their underlying MSCI indices, resulting in similar liquidity profiles suitable for institutional and retail investors.
  • Relative positioning favors EWA for diversification into resources and banking, while EWY offers higher-beta exposure to global technology cycles and semiconductor demand.

Introduction

Investors seeking geographic diversification within the Asia-Pacific region often evaluate single-country ETFs such as EWA and EWY to gain precise exposure to Australia’s resource-based economy or South Korea’s technology-driven market. These funds do not compete directly but serve as complementary or alternative vehicles for those targeting distinct economic drivers, including commodity prices for Australia and global electronics supply chains for South Korea. The comparison highlights structural differences in sector composition, cost, and thematic alignment that influence their roles in broader portfolios.

iShares MSCI Australia ETF (EWA) Overview

The iShares MSCI Australia ETF (EWA) is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the performance of the MSCI Australia Index, which measures large- and mid-capitalization Australian equities. The ETF typically holds around 46 securities and employs a market-capitalization-weighted methodology with quarterly rebalancing. Top holdings commonly include Commonwealth Bank of Australia, BHP Group, Westpac Banking Corporation, National Australia Bank, and ANZ Group Holdings. Sector allocations are led by financials at approximately 41% and materials at 25%, with smaller weights in consumer discretionary, real estate, and industrials. The expense ratio stands at 0.50%. As a standard equity ETF issued by iShares (BlackRock), EWA offers straightforward, non-leveraged exposure without derivatives or active management overlays.

iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) Overview

The iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) is a passively managed fund designed to track the MSCI Korea 25/50 Index, which covers large- and mid-capitalization South Korean equities with capping constraints to promote diversification. The ETF generally contains about 81 holdings and follows a market-capitalization-weighted approach with periodic rebalancing. Prominent holdings frequently feature Samsung Electronics, SK Hynix, Hyundai Motor, KB Financial Group, and SK Square. Sector exposure is concentrated in information technology, consumer discretionary, and financials. The expense ratio is 0.59%. Issued by iShares (BlackRock), EWY provides non-leveraged, index-based access to the South Korean market through a conventional ETF structure.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the broader Asia-Pacific equity landscape, where macroeconomic factors such as global trade dynamics, commodity price fluctuations, and technology supply-chain shifts influence performance. Australia’s market remains sensitive to iron ore, coal, and energy exports, while South Korea’s economy is closely tied to semiconductor demand, automotive production, and consumer electronics exports. Capital flows into the region often respond to interest-rate expectations in major economies, geopolitical tensions affecting trade routes, and regulatory developments in technology and financial services. These structural characteristics create distinct risk and return profiles without overlapping sector concentrations.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, EWA has exhibited relatively stable behavior linked to commodity price trends and Australian banking sector earnings, resulting in lower volatility compared to more technology-sensitive peers. EWY has shown greater sensitivity to global semiconductor cycles and earnings reports from major technology firms, leading to higher beta characteristics during periods of tech-sector rotation. Over broader timeframes, the funds’ relative positioning reflects their underlying economies: EWA benefits from resource demand and domestic financial stability, while EWY aligns with export-oriented technology growth. Differences in sector momentum and macroeconomic drivers continue to shape their distinct trajectories without reliance on short-term price fluctuations.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights on ETFs like EWA and EWY may find the tool useful for refining their analysis.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including lower expense ratio, balanced sector diversification across financials and materials, and more stable exposure profile, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to EWA for investors prioritizing cost efficiency and commodity-linked resilience. EWY retains appeal for those seeking concentrated technology exposure, though its higher fee and elevated volatility warrant careful consideration relative to individual risk tolerance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
EWA vs. EWY commentary
Jun 22, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWA is a Hold and EWY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWY has more net assets: 26.3B vs. EWA (1.45B). EWY has a higher annual dividend yield than EWA: EWY (125.468) vs EWA (10.582). EWA was incepted earlier than EWY: EWA (30 years) vs EWY (26 years). EWA (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than EWY (0.59). EWY has a higher turnover EWA (6.00) vs EWA (6.00).
EWAEWYEWA / EWY
Gain YTD10.582125.4688%
Net Assets1.45B26.3B6%
Total Expense Ratio0.500.5985%
Turnover6.0049.0012%
Yield2.870.99290%
Fund Existence30 years26 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EWAEWY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EWA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EWY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XSD636.3043.05
+7.26%
State Street® SPDR® S&P® Smcndctr ETF
JXX32.890.59
+1.84%
Janus Henderson Transformational Gr ETF
EBIT38.970.49
+1.28%
Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF
EIRL77.310.14
+0.18%
iShares MSCI Ireland ETF
DJD62.71-0.30
-0.48%
Invesco Dow Jones Industrial Avg Div ETF

EWA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWA has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWA jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EWA
1D Price
Change %
EWA100%
-0.31%
BHP - EWA
70%
Closely correlated
-2.76%
RIO - EWA
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.52%
AMP - EWA
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.96%
TPG - EWA
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
IAG - EWA
50%
Loosely correlated
-3.98%
More