| EWA | IAF | EWA / IAF | |
| Gain YTD | 8.086 | 3.456 | 234% |
| Net Assets | 1.33B | 131M | 1,018% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.65 | 30% |
| Turnover | 5.00 | 17.00 | 29% |
| Yield | 3.04 | 3.41 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 40 years | - |
| EWA | IAF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 83% | 8 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWA has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWA jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that IAF and CSL have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IAF and CSL's prices will move in lockstep.