EWBC
Price
$132.63
Change
+$2.45 (+1.88%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
18.17B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FULT
Price
$23.36
Change
+$0.36 (+1.57%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
4.46B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EWBC vs FULT

Header iconEWBC vs FULT Comparison
Open Charts EWBC vs FULTBanner chart's image
EWBC vs FULT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EWBC vs. FULT commentary
Jun 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWBC is a Buy and FULT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 14, 2026
Stock price -- (EWBC: $132.63 vs. FULT: $23.36)
Brand notoriety: EWBC and FULT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EWBC: 116% vs. FULT: 130%
Market capitalization -- EWBC: $18.17B vs. FULT: $4.46B
EWBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $18.17B. FULT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EWBC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFULT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EWBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FULT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than EWBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EWBC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FULT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EWBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FULT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EWBC is a better buy in the short-term than FULT.

Price Growth

EWBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.31% price change this week, while FULT (@Regional Banks) price change was +6.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

EWBC is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2026.

FULT is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.72% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWBC($18.2B) has a higher market cap than FULT($4.47B). EWBC has higher P/E ratio than FULT: EWBC (13.25) vs FULT (11.12). FULT YTD gains are higher at: 21.988 vs. EWBC (19.600). EWBC has more cash in the bank: 656M vs. FULT (271M). FULT has less debt than EWBC: FULT (1.25B) vs EWBC (3.18B). EWBC has higher revenues than FULT: EWBC (2.98B) vs FULT (1.33B).
EWBCFULTEWBC / FULT
Capitalization18.2B4.47B408%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD19.60021.98889%
P/E Ratio13.2511.12119%
Revenue2.98B1.33B225%
Total Cash656M271M242%
Total Debt3.18B1.25B254%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EWBC vs FULT: Fundamental Ratings
EWBC
FULT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2439
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3543
SMR RATING
1..100
1323
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4142
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3446
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (29) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EWBC (89). This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than EWBC’s over the last 12 months.

EWBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (43). This means that EWBC’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

EWBC's SMR Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (23). This means that EWBC’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

EWBC's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (42). This means that EWBC’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

EWBC's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (46). This means that EWBC’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EWBCFULT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EWBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FULT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SGDM66.442.24
+3.49%
Sprott Gold Miners ETF
LSAF51.830.27
+0.53%
LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor® US Cr Eq ETF
FENI40.290.13
+0.32%
Fidelity Enhanced International ETF
IAUI51.290.08
+0.16%
NEOS Gold High Income ETF
BLKC20.63N/A
N/A
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF

EWBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWBC has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWBC jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EWBC
1D Price
Change %
EWBC100%
+1.88%
ASB - EWBC
84%
Closely correlated
+2.07%
FNB - EWBC
84%
Closely correlated
+1.91%
ZION - EWBC
83%
Closely correlated
+1.22%
ONB - EWBC
83%
Closely correlated
+1.82%
FULT - EWBC
83%
Closely correlated
+1.57%
More

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
+1.57%
ASB - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
+2.07%
FNB - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
+1.91%
UBSI - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
+2.35%
UCB - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
+1.05%
ONB - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
+1.82%
More