EWC | FGM | EWC / FGM | |
Gain YTD | 22.829 | 49.031 | 47% |
Net Assets | 3.23B | 70.6M | 4,568% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.80 | 63% |
Turnover | 4.00 | 92.00 | 4% |
Yield | 1.76 | 0.71 | 246% |
Fund Existence | 30 years | 14 years | - |
EWC | FGM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago72% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago83% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago84% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago81% | 4 days ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago83% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago81% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWC has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWC jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FGM has been loosely correlated with SAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FGM jumps, then SAP could also see price increases.