EWC | FLGB | EWC / FLGB | |
Gain YTD | 16.684 | 19.255 | 87% |
Net Assets | 3.09B | 783M | 395% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.09 | 556% |
Turnover | 4.00 | 10.13 | 39% |
Yield | 1.85 | 3.63 | 51% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 8 years | - |
EWC | FLGB | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago82% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago78% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago87% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago76% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 9 days ago82% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago81% | 29 days ago75% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago81% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago82% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWC has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWC jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLGB has been loosely correlated with NWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLGB jumps, then NWG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLGB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FLGB | 100% | -0.02% | ||
NWG - FLGB | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.75% | ||
SHEL - FLGB | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
RIO - FLGB | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.52% | ||
CCEP - FLGB | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.71% | ||
HL - FLGB | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
More |