Ad is loading...
EWC vs FLGB
EWC vs FLGB Comparison
Open Charts EWC vs FLGB
iShares MSCI Canada ETF
Price$42.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$7.25K
Net Assets2.7B
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF
Price$29.04
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
Volume$100
Net Assets735.05M
EWC vs FLGB Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EWC vs. FLGB commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWC is a Buy and FLGB is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWC has more net assets: 2.7B vs. FLGB (735M). FLGB has a higher annual dividend yield than EWC: FLGB (10.729) vs EWC (4.367). EWC was incepted earlier than FLGB: EWC (29 years) vs FLGB (7 years). FLGB (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than EWC (0.50). FLGB has a higher turnover EWC (4.00) vs EWC (4.00).
| EWC | FLGB | EWC / FLGB | |
| Gain YTD | 4.367 | 10.729 | 41% |
| Net Assets | 2.7B | 735M | 368% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.09 | 556% |
| Turnover | 4.00 | 4.70 | 85% |
| Yield | 2.21 | 4.06 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EWC | FLGB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 11 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 80% | 18 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EWC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWC has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWC jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
FLGB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLGB has been loosely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLGB jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLGB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLGB | 100% | +0.94% | ||
| SHEL - FLGB | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| NWG - FLGB | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| CCEP - FLGB | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| RIO - FLGB | 56% Loosely correlated | +2.48% | ||
| WPP - FLGB | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.88% | ||
More | ||||