| EWC | FLGB | EWC / FLGB | |
| Gain YTD | 14.574 | 12.159 | 120% |
| Net Assets | 6.48B | 931M | 696% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.09 | 556% |
| Turnover | 4.00 | 5.00 | 80% |
| Yield | 1.27 | 2.85 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 9 years | - |
| EWC | FLGB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 89% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 68% | 5 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 5 days ago 82% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWC has been closely correlated with BMO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWC jumps, then BMO could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLGB has been closely correlated with NWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLGB jumps, then NWG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLGB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLGB | 100% | -0.24% | ||
| NWG - FLGB | 70% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| RIO - FLGB | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| CRH - FLGB | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| IAG - FLGB | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| EVR - FLGB | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.61% | ||
More | ||||