EWC | IAF | EWC / IAF | |
Gain YTD | -2.035 | -0.892 | 228% |
Net Assets | 2.42B | 122M | 1,984% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.65 | 30% |
Turnover | 4.00 | 17.00 | 24% |
Yield | 2.18 | 0.90 | 243% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 39 years | - |
EWC | IAF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago87% | 1 day ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago87% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago84% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 1 day ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 1 day ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 30 days ago85% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 1 day ago87% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago89% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 1 day ago88% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWC has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWC jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that IAF and CSL have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IAF and CSL's prices will move in lockstep.