EWC | IAF | EWC / IAF | |
Gain YTD | 13.923 | 11.762 | 118% |
Net Assets | 3.09B | 135M | 2,285% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.65 | 30% |
Turnover | 4.00 | 17.00 | 24% |
Yield | 2.00 | 3.38 | 59% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 40 years | - |
EWC | IAF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago88% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago79% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago82% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago84% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago82% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago85% | 18 days ago85% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago81% | 12 days ago88% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago85% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago85% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWC has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWC jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that IAF and CSL have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IAF and CSL's prices will move in lockstep.