EWG | EWL | EWG / EWL | |
Gain YTD | 15.431 | 11.858 | 130% |
Net Assets | 2.03B | 1.12B | 181% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.50 | 100% |
Turnover | 3.00 | 6.00 | 50% |
Yield | 2.05 | 1.97 | 104% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 29 years | - |
EWG | EWL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago80% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago78% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago75% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago81% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago78% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago76% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 18 days ago80% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago81% | 2 days ago79% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago80% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago74% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWG has been loosely correlated with SAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWG jumps, then SAP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWL has been loosely correlated with ALC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWL jumps, then ALC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EWL | 100% | -0.16% | ||
ALC - EWL | 54% Loosely correlated | -3.22% | ||
ROG - EWL | 31% Poorly correlated | -11.20% | ||
CFR - EWL | 21% Poorly correlated | -10.46% | ||
BAER - EWL | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.90% | ||
LOGN - EWL | -6% Poorly correlated | N/A |