EWG | EWL | EWG / EWL | |
Gain YTD | 33.627 | 21.062 | 160% |
Net Assets | 2.83B | 1.32B | 214% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.50 | 100% |
Turnover | 3.00 | 6.00 | 50% |
Yield | 1.81 | 1.84 | 98% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 29 years | - |
EWG | EWL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | 1 day ago81% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago72% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago88% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago84% | 1 day ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago80% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago77% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 6 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago82% | 17 days ago79% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago72% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWG has been loosely correlated with SAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWG jumps, then SAP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWL has been loosely correlated with ALC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWL jumps, then ALC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EWL | 100% | +0.31% | ||
ALC - EWL | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.99% | ||
CFR - EWL | 29% Poorly correlated | +2.26% | ||
ROG - EWL | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.83% | ||
BAER - EWL | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.91% | ||
LOGN - EWL | -6% Poorly correlated | N/A |