| EWG | EWL | EWG / EWL | |
| Gain YTD | -1.043 | 5.945 | -18% |
| Net Assets | 1.53B | 2.12B | 72% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.50 | 98% |
| Turnover | 2.00 | 9.00 | 22% |
| Yield | 2.01 | 1.74 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 30 years | - |
| EWG | EWL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% | 19 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 78% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWG has been loosely correlated with NEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWG jumps, then NEM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that EWL and ROG have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EWL and ROG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWL | 100% | -0.81% | ||
| ROG - EWL | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.96% | ||
| CFR - EWL | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.66% | ||
| ALC - EWL | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.75% | ||
| BAER - EWL | 3% Poorly correlated | -2.06% |