| EWG | EWL | EWG / EWL | |
| Gain YTD | 5.293 | 8.032 | 66% |
| Net Assets | 1.72B | 2.39B | 72% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.50 | 98% |
| Turnover | 2.00 | 9.00 | 22% |
| Yield | 1.94 | 1.73 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 30 years | - |
| EWG | EWL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 82% | 9 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 69% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWG has been loosely correlated with NEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWG jumps, then NEM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that EWL and ROG have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EWL and ROG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWL | 100% | -0.59% | ||
| ROG - EWL | 29% Poorly correlated | +2.61% | ||
| CFR - EWL | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.20% | ||
| ALC - EWL | 15% Poorly correlated | -2.35% | ||
| BAER - EWL | 4% Poorly correlated | -7.69% |