| EWG | EWL | EWG / EWL | |
| Gain YTD | 2.518 | 3.002 | 84% |
| Net Assets | 1.48B | 1.7B | 87% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.50 | 98% |
| Turnover | 2.00 | 9.00 | 22% |
| Yield | 1.56 | 1.62 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 30 years | - |
| EWG | EWL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 8 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 76% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWG has been loosely correlated with NEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWG jumps, then NEM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWL has been loosely correlated with ROG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWL jumps, then ROG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWL | 100% | -0.37% | ||
| ROG - EWL | 34% Loosely correlated | +4.90% | ||
| BAER - EWL | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.90% | ||
| CFR - EWL | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.07% | ||
| ALC - EWL | 8% Poorly correlated | -2.16% |