| EWG | EWO | EWG / EWO | |
| Gain YTD | 5.293 | 26.683 | 20% |
| Net Assets | 1.72B | 203M | 845% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.49 | 100% |
| Turnover | 2.00 | 24.00 | 8% |
| Yield | 1.94 | 1.98 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 30 years | - |
| EWG | EWO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 83% | 16 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 72% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWG has been loosely correlated with NEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWG jumps, then NEM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that EWO and ATS have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EWO and ATS's prices will move in lockstep.