EWG | GREK | EWG / GREK | |
Gain YTD | 33.627 | 42.975 | 78% |
Net Assets | 2.83B | 261M | 1,085% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.57 | 88% |
Turnover | 3.00 | 24.24 | 12% |
Yield | 1.81 | 3.29 | 55% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 14 years | - |
EWG | GREK | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | 1 day ago82% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago84% | 1 day ago74% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago90% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago88% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 10 days ago88% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago82% | 3 days ago74% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago69% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWG has been loosely correlated with SAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWG jumps, then SAP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that GREK and TEN have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GREK and TEN's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GREK | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GREK | 100% | -0.56% | ||
TEN - GREK | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.83% | ||
SAR - GREK | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
CCEC - GREK | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.28% | ||
HTO - GREK | 14% Poorly correlated | -1.35% | ||
MOH - GREK | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.13% | ||
More |