| EWG | GREK | EWG / GREK | |
| Gain YTD | -0.299 | 17.235 | -2% |
| Net Assets | 1.66B | 284M | 586% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.56 | 87% |
| Turnover | 2.00 | 28.96 | 7% |
| Yield | 2.01 | 2.60 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 15 years | - |
| EWG | GREK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWG has been loosely correlated with NEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWG jumps, then NEM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that GREK and TEN have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GREK and TEN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GREK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GREK | 100% | +0.63% | ||
| TEN - GREK | 13% Poorly correlated | -2.48% | ||
| SAR - GREK | 6% Poorly correlated | -2.95% | ||
| CCEC - GREK | 0% Poorly correlated | +1.49% | ||
| MOH - GREK | -1% Poorly correlated | +0.50% | ||
| PPC - GREK | -3% Poorly correlated | +0.04% | ||
More | ||||