EWG | IAF | EWG / IAF | |
Gain YTD | 35.147 | 11.762 | 299% |
Net Assets | 2.87B | 135M | 2,125% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.65 | 30% |
Turnover | 3.00 | 17.00 | 18% |
Yield | 1.81 | 3.38 | 54% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 40 years | - |
EWG | IAF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago88% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago79% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago82% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago84% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago82% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 18 days ago85% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago82% | 12 days ago88% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago85% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago85% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWG has been loosely correlated with SAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWG jumps, then SAP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that IAF and CSL have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IAF and CSL's prices will move in lockstep.