EWG | IAF | EWG / IAF | |
Gain YTD | 24.104 | 2.298 | 1,049% |
Net Assets | 2.23B | 127M | 1,759% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.65 | 30% |
Turnover | 3.00 | 17.00 | 18% |
Yield | 2.05 | 1.31 | 156% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 39 years | - |
EWG | IAF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago89% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago89% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago87% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago81% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 2 days ago85% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago81% | 4 days ago88% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago86% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago82% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWG has been loosely correlated with SAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWG jumps, then SAP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that IAF and CSL have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IAF and CSL's prices will move in lockstep.