| EWG | IAF | EWG / IAF | |
| Gain YTD | -0.851 | 0.887 | -96% |
| Net Assets | 1.61B | 134M | 1,202% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 1.65 | 30% |
| Turnover | 2.00 | 19.00 | 11% |
| Yield | 2.01 | 1.06 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 41 years | - |
| EWG | IAF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 83% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWG has been loosely correlated with NEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWG jumps, then NEM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that IAF and CSL have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IAF and CSL's prices will move in lockstep.