EWG
Price
$42.31
Change
+$0.04 (+0.09%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Net Assets
1.49B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KF
Price
$72.82
Change
-$0.09 (-0.12%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Net Assets
350.59M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EWG vs KF

Header iconEWG vs KF Comparison
Open Charts EWG vs KFBanner chart's image
EWG vs KF Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG) vs. The Korea Fund, Inc. (KF)

Key Takeaways

  • The iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG) provides passive exposure to large- and mid-cap German equities through a broad market-cap-weighted index, while The Korea Fund, Inc. (KF) is an actively managed closed-end fund focused on Korean securities.
  • EWG maintains a diversified portfolio of approximately 54 holdings with an expense ratio of 0.49%, emphasizing sectors such as industrials and financials.
  • KF holds around 53 to 57 securities with a significantly higher expense ratio of 1.75%, featuring concentrated exposure to information technology and industrials in South Korea.
  • Structural differences include EWG's exchange-traded fund format offering intraday liquidity versus KF's closed-end structure, which may trade at a premium or discount to net asset value.
  • Both funds target single-country equity exposure but differ in management style, cost efficiency, and geographic risk factors tied to European versus Asian economic cycles.
  • Investors comparing the two should evaluate diversification profiles, ongoing fees, and alignment with views on German industrial strength versus Korean technology and manufacturing momentum.

Introduction

The iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG) and The Korea Fund, Inc. (KF) offer investors targeted access to two distinct developed markets. EWG delivers broad, rules-based exposure to German large- and mid-cap companies, while KF pursues active selection of Korean equities. These vehicles do not compete directly but serve as complementary or alternative single-country strategies for investors seeking geographic diversification beyond broad global indexes. Their relevance stems from ongoing interest in European manufacturing resilience and Asian technology supply chains amid shifting global trade and monetary policy dynamics.

iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG) Overview

The iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG) seeks to track the MSCI Germany Index, providing passive exposure to large- and mid-cap German equities. The fund typically holds approximately 54 securities. Top holdings commonly include Siemens AG, SAP SE, Allianz SE, Siemens Energy AG, and Infineon Technologies AG. Sector allocations generally feature industrials at around 30%, financials near 20%, and information technology close to 16%, with smaller weights in consumer discretionary, communication services, and health care. The expense ratio stands at 0.49%. As a traditional exchange-traded fund, EWG employs full replication or optimized sampling with periodic rebalancing aligned to the index methodology, offering high liquidity on major U.S. exchanges.

The Korea Fund, Inc. (KF) Overview

The Korea Fund, Inc. (KF) is a closed-end fund managed to achieve long-term capital appreciation through investment in Korean equity securities. It typically maintains 53 to 57 holdings. Prominent positions often include SK Hynix Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., and other technology and industrial names. Sector weights frequently emphasize information technology above 50%, with meaningful allocations to industrials around 18% and smaller exposures across financials, health care, and consumer discretionary. The expense ratio is 1.75%. As an actively managed closed-end vehicle, KF does not track a specific index and may employ leverage or hold cash flexibly, with shares trading on exchanges potentially at a premium or discount to underlying net asset value.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both funds operate within single-country equity strategies influenced by global manufacturing cycles, technology supply chains, and regional economic policies. German exposure in EWG ties to European industrial output, automotive and machinery exports, and energy transition initiatives. Korean holdings in KF connect to semiconductor leadership, consumer electronics, and heavy industry. Macro drivers include interest rate trajectories in the eurozone and Asia, trade relations, and capital expenditure trends in technology hardware. Regulatory developments around export controls on advanced chips and European fiscal support packages represent ongoing factors shaping sector momentum for both markets.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, EWG has reflected movements in German industrial production and broader eurozone sentiment, exhibiting volatility tied to export demand and energy costs. KF has shown sensitivity to Korean technology earnings and global semiconductor cycles, with potential for sharper swings due to its concentrated active approach. Relative positioning highlights EWG's lower cost structure and index discipline versus KF's potential for manager-driven alpha but higher fees. Volatility differences arise from Germany’s diversified industrial base compared with Korea’s heavier technology weighting, influencing how each fund responds to shifts in global growth expectations or currency movements.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights on funds like the iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG) or The Korea Fund, Inc. (KF) may find the platform useful for refining their research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favor to the iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG) due to its lower expense ratio, broader diversification across holdings, and transparent passive indexing methodology. These attributes support more consistent risk-adjusted exposure within the European equity space compared with the higher-cost active management and concentrated thematic tilt of The Korea Fund, Inc. (KF). Final allocation decisions remain subject to individual investor objectives and market conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
EWG vs. KF commentary
Jun 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWG is a Buy and KF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWG has more net assets: 1.49B vs. KF (351M). KF has a higher annual dividend yield than EWG: KF (100.496) vs EWG (-0.447). EWG was incepted earlier than KF: EWG (30 years) vs KF (42 years). EWG (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than KF (1.25). KF has a higher turnover EWG (2.00) vs EWG (2.00).
EWGKFEWG / KF
Gain YTD-0.447100.496-0%
Net Assets1.49B351M424%
Total Expense Ratio0.491.2539%
Turnover2.0063.003%
Yield1.561.6197%
Fund Existence30 years42 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EWGKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EWG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NQGCX46.630.30
+0.65%
Nuveen Global Equity Income C
CLBFX40.470.11
+0.27%
American Funds American Balanced 529F
PWJAX37.74-0.02
-0.05%
PGIM Jennison International Opps A
DHTYX25.68-0.02
-0.08%
Diamond Hill Select Y
FPHAX33.72-0.23
-0.68%
Fidelity Select Pharmaceuticals Port

EWG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWG has been loosely correlated with NEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWG jumps, then NEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EWG
1D Price
Change %
EWG100%
+0.09%
NEM - EWG
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.71%
LEG - EWG
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
MTX - EWG
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
SAP - EWG
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
HEI - EWG
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.24%
More