EWG | VNM | EWG / VNM | |
Gain YTD | 13.828 | -0.174 | -7,937% |
Net Assets | 1.66B | 352M | 472% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.70 | 71% |
Turnover | 3.00 | 55.00 | 5% |
Yield | 2.05 | 0.00 | - |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 16 years | - |
EWG | VNM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago85% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago79% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago80% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago77% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago77% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago76% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago83% | 9 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago78% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago85% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWG has been loosely correlated with SAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWG jumps, then SAP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that VNM and APH have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VNM and APH's prices will move in lockstep.