EWG | VNM | EWG / VNM | |
Gain YTD | 33.627 | 18.815 | 179% |
Net Assets | 2.83B | 425M | 667% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.68 | 74% |
Turnover | 3.00 | 21.00 | 14% |
Yield | 1.81 | 0.00 | - |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 16 years | - |
EWG | VNM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | 1 day ago76% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago84% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago84% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago83% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 5 days ago80% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago82% | 1 day ago78% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago82% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWG has been loosely correlated with SAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWG jumps, then SAP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that VNM and APH have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VNM and APH's prices will move in lockstep.