| EWG | VNM | EWG / VNM | |
| Gain YTD | 2.518 | -4.979 | -51% |
| Net Assets | 1.48B | 566M | 261% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.66 | 74% |
| Turnover | 2.00 | 48.00 | 4% |
| Yield | 1.56 | 0.20 | 770% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 17 years | - |
| EWG | VNM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 29 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 88% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWG has been loosely correlated with NEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWG jumps, then NEM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that VNM and APH have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VNM and APH's prices will move in lockstep.