| EWG | VNM | EWG / VNM | |
| Gain YTD | -1.043 | -8.124 | 13% |
| Net Assets | 1.53B | 546M | 280% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.66 | 74% |
| Turnover | 2.00 | 48.00 | 4% |
| Yield | 2.01 | 0.20 | 981% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 17 years | - |
| EWG | VNM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 82% | 14 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 79% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWG has been loosely correlated with NEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWG jumps, then NEM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that VNM and APH have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VNM and APH's prices will move in lockstep.