EWH
Price
$21.38
Change
-$0.21 (-0.97%)
Updated
Jun 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
1.13B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
EWT
Price
$98.02
Change
-$2.78 (-2.76%)
Updated
Jun 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
10.63B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EWH vs EWT

Header iconEWH vs EWT Comparison
Open Charts EWH vs EWTBanner chart's image
EWH vs EWT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) vs. iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT)

Key Takeaways

  • iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) provides targeted exposure to Hong Kong equities through a passive strategy tracking the MSCI Hong Kong 25-50 Index, with approximately 27 holdings concentrated in financials, real estate, and industrials.
  • iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) offers passive exposure to Taiwanese equities via the MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index, featuring around 85 holdings heavily weighted toward information technology, including semiconductor leaders.
  • EWH carries a lower expense ratio of 0.50% compared to EWT's 0.59%, potentially benefiting cost-conscious investors seeking broad Asia-Pacific single-country access.
  • Sector allocations diverge sharply: EWH emphasizes financial services and real estate, while EWT maintains dominant information technology exposure exceeding 77% of assets.
  • Both ETFs are iShares funds from BlackRock, employing full replication or optimized sampling within passive, market-capitalization-weighted frameworks without leverage or inverse features.
  • Relative positioning favors EWT for technology-driven growth themes and EWH for diversified financial and property sector stability within Greater China exposure.

Introduction

Investors seeking single-country exposure within Greater China often evaluate iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) as complementary rather than direct competitors. These ETFs target distinct equity markets in Hong Kong and Taiwan, respectively, allowing investors to express differentiated views on regional economic drivers such as property cycles versus semiconductor demand. In the current environment of evolving U.S.-China relations and technology supply-chain shifts, comparing their structural profiles helps clarify allocation decisions between financial-heavy versus technology-centric strategies.

iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) Overview

The iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) is a passive exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the performance of the MSCI Hong Kong 25-50 Index. Launched in 1996, it holds approximately 27 securities and employs a market-capitalization-weighted approach with periodic rebalancing to maintain index alignment. Top holdings include AIA Group, Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing, CK Hutchison Holdings, BOC Hong Kong Holdings, and Sun Hung Kai Properties, reflecting significant concentration in financials (around 45% combined across insurance, banks, and financial services) and real estate. The fund maintains an expense ratio of 0.50% and operates as a standard open-end structure listed on NYSE Arca, offering daily liquidity typical of iShares products.

iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) Overview

The iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) passively tracks the MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index, providing exposure to large- and mid-cap Taiwanese equities. Established in 2000, the fund contains approximately 85 holdings and follows a market-capitalization-weighted methodology with annual or semi-annual rebalancing as needed. Leading positions feature Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), MediaTek, Delta Electronics, Hon Hai Precision Industry, and ASE Technology Holding, resulting in information technology comprising over 77% of the portfolio. It carries an expense ratio of 0.59% and shares the same iShares/BlackRock open-end ETF structure on NYSE Arca, emphasizing liquidity and transparency.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the broader Asia-Pacific equity landscape, influenced by semiconductor supply chains, real estate cycles, and cross-strait geopolitical dynamics. Taiwan's technology sector benefits from global demand for advanced chips and electronics manufacturing, while Hong Kong equities reflect property market sentiment and financial services tied to regional capital flows. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate trajectories, trade policies, and capital allocation between developed and emerging markets continue to shape relative attractiveness. Regulatory developments in both jurisdictions and shifts in global technology investment patterns represent ongoing catalysts and risk considerations for investors evaluating these single-country vehicles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, EWT has demonstrated stronger alignment with technology sector momentum, driven by earnings growth in semiconductor and electronics firms, whereas EWH has reflected more measured movements tied to financial and real estate sector rotations. Volatility differences arise from EWT's concentrated technology exposure compared to EWH's broader sector diversification. Relative positioning highlights EWT's sensitivity to global chip demand and supply-chain trends, while EWH offers ballast through defensive financial holdings during periods of property or banking sector pressure. Over broader timeframes, performance divergences track earnings cycles in top holdings and macroeconomic shifts affecting Asia-Pacific capital flows.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to enhance your research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics, EWT currently presents a probabilistic edge in Tickeron AI analysis due to its deeper diversification across a larger number of holdings, dominant positioning in high-growth information technology sectors, and demonstrated resilience in recent technology-driven market environments. EWH offers cost advantages and exposure to stable financial themes but carries higher concentration risk in fewer holdings. The AI assessment weighs sector momentum, cost efficiency, and risk-adjusted diversification profiles without constituting investment advice.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
EWH vs. EWT commentary
Jun 11, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWH is a Hold and EWT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWT has more net assets: 10.6B vs. EWH (1.13B). EWT has a higher annual dividend yield than EWH: EWT (58.665) vs EWH (1.600). EWH was incepted earlier than EWT: EWH (30 years) vs EWT (26 years). EWH (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than EWT (0.59). EWT has a higher turnover EWH (10.00) vs EWH (10.00).
EWHEWTEWH / EWT
Gain YTD1.60058.6653%
Net Assets1.13B10.6B11%
Total Expense Ratio0.500.5985%
Turnover10.0036.0028%
Yield4.780.97491%
Fund Existence30 years26 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EWHEWT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EWH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EWT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CEUEX63.050.32
+0.51%
American Funds EUPAC 529-E
JWGRX131.750.24
+0.18%
Janus Henderson Global Research S
GCFSX21.75N/A
N/A
Gabelli Global Financial Services C
PHLAX34.57N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Health Sciences A
DGEZX14.12N/A
N/A
Destinations Equity Income Z

EWH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWH has been loosely correlated with FUTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWH jumps, then FUTU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EWH
1D Price
Change %
EWH100%
-1.19%
FUTU - EWH
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%