Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EWMCX vs GFAFX
EWMCX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts EWMCX vs GFAFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$87.82
Change+$0.71 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
EWMCX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EWMCX vs. GFAFX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWMCX is a Buy and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. EWMCX (519M). EWMCX pays higher dividends than GFAFX: EWMCX (0.38) vs GFAFX (0.29). EWMCX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: EWMCX (80 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). EWMCX (0.90) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. EWMCX (8.55). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EWMCX: GFAFX (250) vs EWMCX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.97 vs. EWMCX (8.05). EWMCX return over 5 years is better than : 73.49 vs. GFAFX (49.51).
| EWMCX | GFAFX | EWMCX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.67 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.67 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 80 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.488 | 19.062 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 519M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 0.29 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.05 | 17.97 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.24 | 62.69 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.49 | 49.51 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 200.17 | 105.65 | 189% |