EWN
Price
$67.34
Change
-$0.88 (-1.29%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
624.11M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
EWY
Price
$213.00
Change
-$1.53 (-0.71%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
25.17B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EWN vs EWY

Header iconEWN vs EWY Comparison
Open Charts EWN vs EWYBanner chart's image
EWN vs EWY Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) vs. iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY)

Key Takeaways

  • iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) offers targeted exposure to Dutch equities through a passive strategy tracking the MSCI Netherlands IMI 25/50 Index, with approximately 54 holdings and a lower expense ratio of 0.50%.
  • iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) provides access to South Korean equities via the MSCI Korea 25/50 Index, featuring around 80-100 holdings, a higher expense ratio of 0.59%, and greater assets under management for enhanced liquidity.
  • Both ETFs are single-country, market-cap-weighted passive vehicles with significant semiconductor and technology sector exposure, though EWN concentrates more heavily in a few large-cap names like ASML Holding NV.
  • Structural differences include EWN's smaller scale and European focus versus EWY's larger size, higher trading volume, and Asian market orientation, influencing diversification and risk profiles.
  • Cost efficiency favors EWN, while EWY benefits from broader holdings and stronger liquidity, making each suitable for distinct investor objectives in international equity allocation.
  • Thematic overlap in semiconductors positions both ETFs to respond similarly to global technology demand cycles, yet geographic and regulatory differences create varied exposure to macroeconomic and geopolitical factors.

Introduction

Investors seeking single-country equity exposure often compare iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) as complementary options within developed and emerging international markets. These ETFs do not compete directly in the same geographic region but provide alternative strategies for accessing high-growth sectors like technology and semiconductors through distinct European and Asian economies. Their relevance stems from ongoing global interest in semiconductor supply chains, innovation-driven growth, and diversification beyond U.S. markets, allowing investors to evaluate relative positioning based on cost, concentration, and liquidity characteristics.

iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) Overview

The iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the investment results of the MSCI Netherlands IMI 25/50 Index. This index provides exposure to large-, mid-, and small-cap Dutch companies. The ETF holds approximately 54 securities and maintains a concentrated portfolio, with top holdings including ASML Holding NV, ING Groep NV, Prosus NV, Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize NV, and ASM International NV. Sector allocations emphasize technology, financials, and consumer staples. It features an expense ratio of 0.50% and follows a market-capitalization-weighted methodology with periodic rebalancing aligned to the underlying index. As an iShares product from BlackRock, EWN offers a straightforward, rules-based approach to Dutch equity exposure without active management overlays.

iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) Overview

The iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund designed to track the MSCI Korea 25/50 Index, which measures the performance of large- and mid-cap South Korean equities. The fund typically holds 80 to 100 securities, with top positions concentrated in Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, SK Hynix Inc, and other industrial and technology leaders. Sector weights favor information technology, consumer discretionary, and industrials. It carries an expense ratio of 0.59% and employs a market-capitalization-weighted strategy with index-driven rebalancing. Issued by iShares (BlackRock), EWY delivers broad access to the Korean market with structural emphasis on liquidity and scale.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the global semiconductor and technology ecosystem, where demand for advanced chips, artificial intelligence infrastructure, and electronics manufacturing drives capital allocation. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate trajectories, supply-chain resilience, and trade policies influence sector performance across regions. Geopolitical developments, including U.S.-China tensions and regional stability in Asia and Europe, introduce variability in capital flows and regulatory environments. The Netherlands benefits from its role as a European technology and logistics hub, while South Korea stands as a key player in memory semiconductors and consumer electronics. Investors monitor earnings cycles in these industries alongside broader shifts in global manufacturing and innovation spending.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, EWN has reflected the performance of concentrated Dutch technology leaders amid European economic conditions and semiconductor demand, often exhibiting lower volatility tied to its smaller number of holdings. EWY has shown responsiveness to Asian technology trends and Korean corporate earnings, with its larger scale and holdings count contributing to different liquidity dynamics during periods of sector rotation. Relative positioning highlights EWN's cost advantage and European diversification versus EWY's greater trading volume and exposure to high-growth Asian names. Both have aligned with broader technology momentum while differing in sensitivity to regional interest rates, currency movements, and commodity influences.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to discover additional opportunities aligned with your investment criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic preference to iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) due to its lower expense ratio, efficient concentration in high-quality holdings, and favorable cost structure relative to comparable single-country exposure. EWY offers advantages in liquidity and broader diversification but carries a higher fee, which may weigh on long-term efficiency in certain scenarios. This assessment rests on durable characteristics rather than short-term trends.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
EWN vs. EWY commentary
Jun 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWN is a StrongBuy and EWY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWY has more net assets: 25.2B vs. EWN (624M). EWY has a higher annual dividend yield than EWN: EWY (119.050) vs EWN (18.087). EWN was incepted earlier than EWY: EWN (30 years) vs EWY (26 years). EWN (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than EWY (0.59). EWY has a higher turnover EWN (12.00) vs EWN (12.00).
EWNEWYEWN / EWY
Gain YTD18.087119.05015%
Net Assets624M25.2B2%
Total Expense Ratio0.500.5985%
Turnover12.0049.0024%
Yield4.280.99432%
Fund Existence30 years26 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EWNEWY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EWN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EWY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSMD35.010.10
+0.29%
Congress SMid Growth ETF
QBUF30.68N/A
-0.01%
Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffr ETF - Qt
EMTL42.78-0.04
-0.09%
State Street® DoubleLine® EM Fxd IncETF
IMTM53.27-0.21
-0.39%
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
IDYN30.60-0.20
-0.64%
iShares Intl Eq Fac Rotation Act ETF

EWN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWN has been closely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWN jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EWN
1D Price
Change %
EWN100%
-1.30%
ASML - EWN
85%
Closely correlated
+1.23%
AER - EWN
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
FAST - EWN
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.87%
CCEP - EWN
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%
PHVS - EWN
13%
Poorly correlated
+3.69%
More