| EWP | IAF | EWP / IAF | |
| Gain YTD | 10.910 | 1.949 | 560% |
| Net Assets | 1.87B | 137M | 1,365% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.65 | 30% |
| Turnover | 29.00 | 19.00 | 153% |
| Yield | 2.12 | 1.06 | 199% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 41 years | - |
| EWP | IAF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 81% | 10 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 79% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWP has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWP jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWP | 100% | -0.02% | ||
| SAN - EWP | 88% Closely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| BBVA - EWP | 84% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| FER - EWP | 70% Closely correlated | -1.24% | ||
| AMS - EWP | -6% Poorly correlated | -1.38% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that IAF and CSL have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IAF and CSL's prices will move in lockstep.