EWP | VNAM | EWP / VNAM | |
Gain YTD | 57.413 | 60.461 | 95% |
Net Assets | 1.42B | 24.3M | 5,823% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.51 | 98% |
Turnover | 15.00 | 13.16 | 114% |
Yield | 2.63 | 0.79 | 333% |
Fund Existence | 30 years | 4 years | - |
EWP | VNAM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% | 4 days ago79% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago78% | 4 days ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 4 days ago80% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago80% | 4 days ago80% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago78% | 4 days ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago74% | 4 days ago83% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago87% | 4 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago81% | 21 days ago79% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 4 days ago64% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 4 days ago89% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWP has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWP jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VNAM has been loosely correlated with FRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VNAM jumps, then FRT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VNAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
VNAM | 100% | +1.77% | ||
FRT - VNAM | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.63% | ||
HUT - VNAM | 25% Poorly correlated | -6.02% | ||
KOS - VNAM | 22% Poorly correlated | -7.10% | ||
CMG - VNAM | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.62% | ||
SSB - VNAM | 19% Poorly correlated | -5.03% | ||
More |