| EWP | VNAM | EWP / VNAM | |
| Gain YTD | 17.110 | -1.960 | -873% |
| Net Assets | 2.23B | 36.1M | 6,175% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.51 | 98% |
| Turnover | 29.00 | 22.26 | 130% |
| Yield | 2.68 | 0.48 | 552% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 5 years | - |
| EWP | VNAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 90% | 9 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 87% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWP has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWP jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that VNAM and SSB have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VNAM and SSB's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VNAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VNAM | 100% | -1.34% | ||
| SSB - VNAM | 19% Poorly correlated | +0.13% | ||
| CMG - VNAM | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.19% | ||
| APH - VNAM | 15% Poorly correlated | +4.57% | ||
| SAM - VNAM | 14% Poorly correlated | +1.79% | ||
| HUT - VNAM | 12% Poorly correlated | +8.83% | ||
More | ||||