EWP | VNM | EWP / VNM | |
Gain YTD | 59.334 | 58.798 | 101% |
Net Assets | 1.44B | 570M | 253% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.68 | 74% |
Turnover | 15.00 | 21.00 | 71% |
Yield | 2.63 | 0.00 | - |
Fund Existence | 30 years | 16 years | - |
EWP | VNM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago76% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago74% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago85% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago84% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago87% | 3 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 16 days ago77% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago81% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWP has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWP jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that VNM and APH have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VNM and APH's prices will move in lockstep.