| EWP | VNM | EWP / VNM | |
| Gain YTD | 65.588 | 54.617 | 120% |
| Net Assets | 1.51B | 572M | 264% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.68 | 74% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 21.00 | 71% |
| Yield | 2.60 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 16 years | - |
| EWP | VNM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 81% | 7 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 75% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWP has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWP jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that VNM and APH have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VNM and APH's prices will move in lockstep.