| EWP | VNM | EWP / VNM | |
| Gain YTD | 17.110 | -8.281 | -207% |
| Net Assets | 2.23B | 520M | 429% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.66 | 76% |
| Turnover | 29.00 | 48.00 | 60% |
| Yield | 2.68 | 0.21 | 1,270% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 17 years | - |
| EWP | VNM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 90% | 17 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 84% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWP has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWP jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that VNM and APH have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VNM and APH's prices will move in lockstep.