EWT
Price
$102.93
Change
-$1.98 (-1.89%)
Updated
Jun 26, 12:46 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
10.91B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FLTW
Price
$102.23
Change
+$0.31 (+0.30%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Net Assets
3.05B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EWT vs FLTW

EWT vs FLTW Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) vs. Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW)

Key Takeaways

  • iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) both provide targeted exposure to Taiwanese equities, with heavy concentration in the information technology sector driven by semiconductor leaders such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC).
  • EWT tracks the MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index and maintains approximately 86-90 holdings, while FLTW follows the FTSE Taiwan Capped Index with roughly 130-132 holdings, offering marginally broader diversification.
  • FLTW features a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.19% compared to EWT’s 0.59%, resulting in a structural cost advantage for long-term holders.
  • Both ETFs exhibit similar sector allocations dominated by information technology (typically 70-80%), followed by financials and industrials, reflecting Taiwan’s export-oriented economy and global semiconductor supply-chain role.
  • EWT benefits from greater liquidity and higher average daily trading volume due to its longer track record and larger assets under management, whereas FLTW provides cost-efficient access with a more recent inception.
  • Structural differences in index construction—EWT’s 25/50 capping versus FLTW’s RIC capping—lead to modest variations in top-holdings concentration and potential tracking characteristics over market cycles.

Introduction

Taiwan-focused equity ETFs have gained relevance amid ongoing global semiconductor demand, supply-chain realignments, and interest in Asia-Pacific growth exposure. iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) do not compete directly with broad-market or U.S.-centric funds; instead, they offer alternative single-country strategies for investors seeking concentrated Taiwan equity exposure. Both passive vehicles target similar investor objectives—access to Taiwan’s technology-driven economy—yet differ in cost, index methodology, and diversification breadth, making them useful for side-by-side evaluation within a tactical allocation framework.

iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) Overview

The iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) seeks to track the investment results of the MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index, which measures the performance of large- and mid-capitalization Taiwanese equities with constraints to limit single-stock and sector concentration. The fund holds approximately 86-90 securities and is passively managed. Top holdings typically include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) as the largest position, followed by names such as MediaTek, Delta Electronics, Hon Hai Precision Industry, and ASE Technology. Sector allocation is heavily weighted toward information technology, often exceeding 70%, with meaningful exposure to financials and industrials. The expense ratio stands at 0.59%. Launched in 2000 by iShares (BlackRock), EWT employs full replication where feasible and maintains a rebalancing approach aligned with the underlying index methodology. Its established presence supports higher liquidity compared with newer peers.

Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) Overview

The Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) aims to replicate the performance of the FTSE Taiwan Capped Index (or RIC Capped variant), which measures large- and mid-cap Taiwanese equities subject to capping rules designed to promote diversification. The fund contains approximately 130-132 holdings and follows a passive strategy. Leading positions generally feature Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), Delta Electronics, MediaTek, Hon Hai Precision Industry, and ASE Technology. Information technology comprises the dominant sector allocation, typically around 75-80%, with secondary weights in financials and industrials. The expense ratio is 0.19%. Issued by Franklin Templeton and launched in 2017, FLTW utilizes a capping methodology that can result in slightly lower concentration in the largest constituents relative to uncapped or differently capped benchmarks. The structure emphasizes cost efficiency and broader holdings coverage within the same market universe.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Taiwan’s equity market is dominated by the semiconductor and electronics supply chain, positioning both ETFs at the intersection of global technology demand and geopolitical considerations. Key macro drivers include artificial intelligence-related capital expenditures, advanced chip manufacturing cycles, and export strength in high-performance computing components. Regulatory developments around export controls and cross-strait relations remain influential, while interest-rate expectations and U.S.-China trade dynamics affect capital flows into the sector. Broader risks encompass supply-chain disruptions, currency fluctuations in the New Taiwan dollar, and cyclicality in semiconductor capital spending. The thematic environment favors Taiwan’s specialized manufacturing role but introduces volatility tied to global technology spending patterns and macroeconomic shifts.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, both EWT and FLTW have delivered returns closely aligned with Taiwan’s technology sector momentum, with performance influenced by earnings trends at major semiconductor firms and broader AI-driven demand. FLTW’s lower expense ratio and marginally wider diversification have contributed to modest relative advantages in certain periods, while EWT’s greater liquidity has supported tighter spreads during higher-volume trading sessions. In recent weeks and months, sector rotation toward technology and shifts in interest-rate expectations have affected both funds similarly, though differences in index capping can produce small variations in volatility and drawdown profiles. Relative positioning favors FLTW for cost-conscious investors seeking comparable exposure, whereas EWT appeals to those prioritizing established trading depth within the Taiwan equity universe.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights on ETFs such as EWT and FLTW may find the platform a useful complement to traditional research.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorability to Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW). The lower expense ratio, broader holdings base, and comparable sector exposure provide a cost-efficiency edge while maintaining similar thematic positioning within the Taiwan technology landscape. EWT remains competitive due to superior liquidity and longer operational history, yet the cost differential and diversification characteristics tilt the probabilistic assessment toward FLTW for most long-horizon allocation scenarios.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
EWT vs. FLTW commentary
Jun 26, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWT is a Hold and FLTW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWT has more net assets: 10.9B vs. FLTW (3.05B). FLTW (68.031) and EWT (65.135) have matching annual dividend yield . EWT was incepted earlier than FLTW: EWT (26 years) vs FLTW (9 years). FLTW (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than EWT (0.59). FLTW has a higher turnover EWT (36.00) vs EWT (36.00).
EWTFLTWEWT / FLTW
Gain YTD65.13568.03196%
Net Assets10.9B3.05B358%
Total Expense Ratio0.590.19311%
Turnover36.00195.5318%
Yield0.971.5165%
Fund Existence26 years9 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EWTFLTW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EWT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FLTW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EUDG38.420.41
+1.08%
WisdomTree Europe Quality Div Gr ETF
CWI40.330.34
+0.85%
State Street® SPDR® MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF
AVGV85.040.51
+0.60%
Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF
PUSH50.490.01
+0.03%
PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF
OEI25.29-0.06
-0.25%
Optimized Equity Income ETF