EWU | VNAM | EWU / VNAM | |
Gain YTD | 6.714 | -6.494 | -103% |
Net Assets | 3.15B | 11.8M | 26,661% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 6.00 | 44.49 | 13% |
Yield | 4.02 | 0.46 | 878% |
Fund Existence | 29 years | 3 years | - |
EWU | VNAM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago74% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago88% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago81% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago78% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago78% | 8 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago80% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago79% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago73% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWU has been loosely correlated with NWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWU jumps, then NWG could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that VNAM and SSB have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VNAM and SSB's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VNAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
VNAM | 100% | -0.05% | ||
SSB - VNAM | 19% Poorly correlated | -1.40% | ||
APH - VNAM | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.47% | ||
SAM - VNAM | 14% Poorly correlated | +1.94% | ||
GIL - VNAM | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.76% | ||
HDB - VNAM | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.22% | ||
More |