EWY and VPL both deliver equity exposure to the Asia-Pacific region but target distinctly different segments of that market. EWY focuses exclusively on South Korea, offering a single-country strategy, while VPL provides diversified access to developed Pacific markets including Japan, Australia, Hong Kong, Singapore, and South Korea. Investors comparing these ETFs often weigh concentrated country risk against broader regional diversification, cost efficiency, and sector exposure within the same geographic theme. The comparison helps clarify trade-offs for those seeking Pacific growth without direct competition between the two funds.
The iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the investment results of the MSCI South Korea 25/50 Index, which measures the performance of large- and mid-capitalization companies in South Korea. The ETF holds approximately 84 securities and maintains a concentrated portfolio. Top holdings typically include Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, which together often account for a substantial portion of assets alongside other technology and industrial names. Sector allocations are dominated by information technology (roughly 52–60%) and industrials (16–20%), with smaller weights in financial services. EWY carries an expense ratio of 0.59% and employs a market-capitalization-weighted methodology with periodic rebalancing to align with the underlying index. Its structure emphasizes targeted South Korean equity exposure within a single-country framework.
The Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) is a passively managed fund designed to track the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index, providing exposure to large-, mid-, and small-capitalization stocks across developed Pacific markets. The ETF holds more than 2,300 securities, resulting in broad diversification. Top holdings feature a mix of companies from Japan, South Korea, and Australia, such as Samsung Electronics, Toyota Motor, and various financial institutions, with no single position dominating the portfolio. Sector weights are more evenly distributed, with technology around 22%, industrials near 20%, and financial services approximately 19%. VPL maintains a low expense ratio of 0.07% and uses full replication with regular rebalancing to match the index. Its structure supports regional Pacific exposure with reduced reliance on any single market.
The Pacific equity markets encompassing both ETFs are influenced by global technology supply chains, semiconductor demand, manufacturing cycles, and trade dynamics involving major economies in the region. South Korea’s technology sector, central to EWY, benefits from advancements in memory chips and electronics, while broader Pacific markets captured by VPL reflect contributions from Japanese industrials, Australian resources, and regional financial services. Macroeconomic drivers include interest rate policies, export growth, and geopolitical developments affecting supply chains. Sector risks involve currency fluctuations, regulatory changes in technology exports, and shifts in global capital flows toward or away from Asia-Pacific equities during different economic cycles.
In recent market cycles, EWY has exhibited higher volatility due to its concentrated South Korean technology exposure, with performance closely tied to semiconductor earnings and global chip demand. VPL has generally delivered smoother returns through its diversified holdings across multiple Pacific countries, mitigating single-market swings. Relative positioning shows EWY benefiting more during periods of strong Korean tech momentum, while VPL provides steadier participation in regional growth across Japan and Australia. Differences in sector concentration and geographic spread influence how each fund responds to broader shifts such as technology rotation or commodity price movements affecting Pacific exporters.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights on ETFs like EWY and VPL may find the tool useful for refining their research process.
Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic edge to VPL due to its significantly lower expense ratio, substantially greater diversification across holdings and geographies, and more balanced sector exposure, which collectively support consistent trend participation with lower single-country risk. EWY offers compelling targeted exposure but carries higher costs and concentration that may amplify volatility in varying market environments.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| EWY | VPL | EWY / VPL | |
| Gain YTD | 97.696 | 25.730 | 380% |
| Net Assets | 26.1B | 13.8B | 189% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.07 | 843% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 7.00 | 700% |
| Yield | 0.99 | 2.76 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 21 years | - |
| EWY | VPL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 14 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 85% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VPL has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VPL jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.