EWY
Price
$192.20
Change
-$26.82 (-12.25%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Net Assets
26.14B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VPL
Price
$113.66
Change
-$7.07 (-5.86%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Net Assets
13.83B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EWY vs VPL

EWY vs VPL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) vs. Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL)

Key Takeaways

  • EWY provides concentrated exposure to South Korean equities, tracking the MSCI South Korea 25/50 Index with approximately 84 holdings, while VPL offers broad diversification across developed Pacific markets, tracking the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index with over 2,300 holdings.
  • EWY features a higher expense ratio of 0.59% compared to VPL’s low-cost 0.07%, reflecting the single-country focus versus regional breadth.
  • Sector allocations differ markedly: EWY is heavily weighted toward information technology (approximately 52–60%) and industrials, whereas VPL maintains a more balanced profile with notable allocations to technology, industrials, and financial services.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed index funds, but VPL’s inclusion of major markets such as Japan and Australia reduces single-country risk relative to EWY’s South Korea-centric approach.
  • Top holdings in EWY concentrate in semiconductor leaders like Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, while VPL’s top positions are more dispersed across Pacific companies including Japanese firms and select Korean names.
  • VPL’s broader geographic diversification and lower costs position it as a lower-volatility option for Pacific regional exposure, whereas EWY suits investors seeking targeted South Korea sector momentum.

Introduction

EWY and VPL both deliver equity exposure to the Asia-Pacific region but target distinctly different segments of that market. EWY focuses exclusively on South Korea, offering a single-country strategy, while VPL provides diversified access to developed Pacific markets including Japan, Australia, Hong Kong, Singapore, and South Korea. Investors comparing these ETFs often weigh concentrated country risk against broader regional diversification, cost efficiency, and sector exposure within the same geographic theme. The comparison helps clarify trade-offs for those seeking Pacific growth without direct competition between the two funds.

iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) Overview

The iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the investment results of the MSCI South Korea 25/50 Index, which measures the performance of large- and mid-capitalization companies in South Korea. The ETF holds approximately 84 securities and maintains a concentrated portfolio. Top holdings typically include Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, which together often account for a substantial portion of assets alongside other technology and industrial names. Sector allocations are dominated by information technology (roughly 52–60%) and industrials (16–20%), with smaller weights in financial services. EWY carries an expense ratio of 0.59% and employs a market-capitalization-weighted methodology with periodic rebalancing to align with the underlying index. Its structure emphasizes targeted South Korean equity exposure within a single-country framework.

Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) Overview

The Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) is a passively managed fund designed to track the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index, providing exposure to large-, mid-, and small-capitalization stocks across developed Pacific markets. The ETF holds more than 2,300 securities, resulting in broad diversification. Top holdings feature a mix of companies from Japan, South Korea, and Australia, such as Samsung Electronics, Toyota Motor, and various financial institutions, with no single position dominating the portfolio. Sector weights are more evenly distributed, with technology around 22%, industrials near 20%, and financial services approximately 19%. VPL maintains a low expense ratio of 0.07% and uses full replication with regular rebalancing to match the index. Its structure supports regional Pacific exposure with reduced reliance on any single market.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The Pacific equity markets encompassing both ETFs are influenced by global technology supply chains, semiconductor demand, manufacturing cycles, and trade dynamics involving major economies in the region. South Korea’s technology sector, central to EWY, benefits from advancements in memory chips and electronics, while broader Pacific markets captured by VPL reflect contributions from Japanese industrials, Australian resources, and regional financial services. Macroeconomic drivers include interest rate policies, export growth, and geopolitical developments affecting supply chains. Sector risks involve currency fluctuations, regulatory changes in technology exports, and shifts in global capital flows toward or away from Asia-Pacific equities during different economic cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, EWY has exhibited higher volatility due to its concentrated South Korean technology exposure, with performance closely tied to semiconductor earnings and global chip demand. VPL has generally delivered smoother returns through its diversified holdings across multiple Pacific countries, mitigating single-market swings. Relative positioning shows EWY benefiting more during periods of strong Korean tech momentum, while VPL provides steadier participation in regional growth across Japan and Australia. Differences in sector concentration and geographic spread influence how each fund responds to broader shifts such as technology rotation or commodity price movements affecting Pacific exporters.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights on ETFs like EWY and VPL may find the tool useful for refining their research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic edge to VPL due to its significantly lower expense ratio, substantially greater diversification across holdings and geographies, and more balanced sector exposure, which collectively support consistent trend participation with lower single-country risk. EWY offers compelling targeted exposure but carries higher costs and concentration that may amplify volatility in varying market environments.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
EWY vs. VPL commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWY is a Hold and VPL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWY has more net assets: 26.1B vs. VPL (13.8B). EWY has a higher annual dividend yield than VPL: EWY (97.696) vs VPL (25.730). EWY was incepted earlier than VPL: EWY (26 years) vs VPL (21 years). VPL (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than EWY (0.59). EWY has a higher turnover VPL (7.00) vs VPL (7.00).
EWYVPLEWY / VPL
Gain YTD97.69625.730380%
Net Assets26.1B13.8B189%
Total Expense Ratio0.590.07843%
Turnover49.007.00700%
Yield0.992.7636%
Fund Existence26 years21 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EWYVPL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EWY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VPL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SOR44.910.30
+0.67%
Source Capital
IBDV21.730.01
+0.07%
iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corp ETF
BCGD25.72-0.51
-1.94%
Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF
PLTY28.63-0.71
-2.42%
YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF
RSEE38.58-1.15
-2.89%
Rareview Systematic Equity ETF

VPL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VPL has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VPL jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VPL
1D Price
Change %
VPL100%
-5.86%
BHP - VPL
68%
Closely correlated
-4.12%
MFG - VPL
63%
Loosely correlated
-4.63%
ING - VPL
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.71%
RIO - VPL
62%
Loosely correlated
-3.80%
ASX - VPL
59%
Loosely correlated
-8.83%
More