EWY
Price
$180.15
Change
+$6.51 (+3.75%)
Updated
Aug 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
27.89B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VPL
Price
$115.76
Change
+$1.83 (+1.61%)
Updated
Aug 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
13.1B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EWY vs VPL

EWY vs VPL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) vs. Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL)

Key Takeaways

  • The iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) offers concentrated exposure to South Korean equities through a passive strategy tracking the MSCI Korea 25/50 Index, with approximately 78 holdings and an expense ratio of 0.59%.
  • The Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) provides broad diversification across developed Asia Pacific markets excluding Japan via the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan Index, holding over 2,300 securities at a low expense ratio of 0.07%.
  • EWY exhibits higher sector concentration in information technology, driven by dominant positions in semiconductors, while VPL delivers more balanced regional exposure including Australia, Taiwan, and South Korea.
  • Both ETFs are fully passive index trackers with market-capitalization weighting and periodic rebalancing, though EWY carries elevated single-country risk compared to VPL’s multi-market approach.
  • Expense ratio differences highlight VPL’s cost efficiency for long-term holders, whereas EWY targets investors seeking targeted South Korea thematic exposure within the broader Pacific region.
  • Relative positioning favors VPL for diversification and lower costs, while EWY suits those prioritizing concentrated growth potential from South Korea’s technology and industrial sectors.

Introduction

Investors seeking equity exposure to the Asia Pacific region often evaluate single-country and multi-country strategies side by side. The iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) represent complementary yet distinct approaches to this market. EWY delivers targeted access to one of the region’s most dynamic economies, while VPL offers diversified coverage across developed Pacific markets excluding Japan. These ETFs do not compete directly but serve as alternatives or complements depending on an investor’s preference for concentration versus breadth. In the current environment of evolving technology cycles and regional economic shifts, comparing their structural features helps clarify suitable positioning within diversified portfolios.

iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) Overview

The iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) is a passive exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the performance of the MSCI Korea 25/50 Index (Net). It holds approximately 78 securities focused on large- and mid-cap South Korean companies. Top holdings include Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, which together account for a substantial portion of assets, reflecting heavy weighting toward information technology. Sector allocations show information technology at nearly 50%, followed by industrials and financials. The fund charges an expense ratio of 0.59% and employs market-capitalization weighting with regular rebalancing. Issued by BlackRock’s iShares, EWY provides liquid, single-country exposure suitable for investors with a specific South Korea view.

Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) Overview

The Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) is a passive exchange-traded fund designed to track the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan Index. It maintains a highly diversified portfolio of approximately 2,340 holdings across large-, mid-, and small-cap companies in developed Asia Pacific markets. The index includes exposure to South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, Hong Kong, and Singapore among others. Technology represents a notable but less concentrated sector weight compared to single-country peers. VPL features an expense ratio of 0.07%, market-capitalization weighting, and periodic rebalancing. Issued by Vanguard, the ETF emphasizes broad regional diversification at minimal cost for investors seeking Pacific ex-Japan equity exposure.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The Asia Pacific equity landscape continues to be shaped by technology sector leadership, supply-chain realignments, and macroeconomic factors including interest rate trajectories and global trade dynamics. South Korea’s semiconductor and electronics industries remain central to regional performance, while broader Pacific markets benefit from diversified economic drivers such as resources, financial services, and consumer sectors in Australia and Taiwan. Capital flows into developed Asia Pacific equities reflect ongoing interest in export-oriented economies amid evolving geopolitical conditions. Regulatory developments around technology and trade policies add layers of consideration for investors evaluating concentrated versus diversified regional strategies.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, the concentrated nature of the iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has produced more pronounced responses to technology earnings cycles and semiconductor demand fluctuations. The Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL), by contrast, has exhibited smoother relative performance due to its multi-country diversification across Australia, Taiwan, and other markets. Both ETFs have participated in broader sector rotation patterns tied to global growth expectations and commodity trends. EWY’s higher volatility profile aligns with single-country risk, while VPL’s structure supports more stable positioning through wider geographic spread. Investors comparing the two often weigh EWY’s potential for outsized gains against VPL’s emphasis on risk mitigation via diversification.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors interested in exploring additional ideas aligned with the themes discussed in this comparison may find the tool useful for refining their research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural characteristics, the Tickeron AI would likely favor the Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) at present. Its significantly lower expense ratio, extensive diversification across multiple developed Pacific markets, and broad holdings profile offer advantages in cost efficiency and risk distribution. While the iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) provides compelling concentrated exposure to high-growth South Korean technology leaders, VPL’s combination of lower costs and wider geographic spread aligns more closely with durable, lower-volatility positioning in the current environment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
EWY vs. VPL commentary
Aug 26, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EWY is a Buy and VPL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWY has more net assets: 27.9B vs. VPL (13.1B). EWY has a higher annual dividend yield than VPL: EWY (78.605) vs VPL (26.029). EWY was incepted earlier than VPL: EWY (26 years) vs VPL (21 years). VPL (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than EWY (0.59). EWY has a higher turnover VPL (7.00) vs VPL (7.00).
EWYVPLEWY / VPL
Gain YTD78.60526.029302%
Net Assets27.9B13.1B213%
Total Expense Ratio0.590.07843%
Turnover49.007.00700%
Yield1.252.7545%
Fund Existence26 years21 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EWYVPL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EWY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VPL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PFD11.220.01
+0.09%
Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Fund
BSCR19.60N/A
+0.02%
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corp Bd ETF
ZTRE50.55-0.01
-0.02%
F/M 3-Yr Invmt Grd Corp Bd ETF
FTMH11.50-0.01
-0.07%
Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF
TLA23.91-0.49
-1.99%
GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF

VPL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VPL has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VPL jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VPL
1D Price
Change %
VPL100%
-1.03%
BHP - VPL
67%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
ASX - VPL
66%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
RIO - VPL
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
MFG - VPL
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
ING - VPL
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
More