EWZ | ILF | EWZ / ILF | |
Gain YTD | 13.150 | 12.243 | 107% |
Net Assets | 3.4B | 1.33B | 256% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 22.00 | 24.00 | 92% |
Yield | 6.10 | 4.71 | 130% |
Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
EWZ | ILF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago79% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago84% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago84% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago86% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago83% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago88% | 5 days ago85% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago85% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago83% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ILF | 100% | -2.90% | ||
ITUB - ILF | 72% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
VALE - ILF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.39% | ||
GGB - ILF | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.42% | ||
SCCO - ILF | 61% Loosely correlated | -5.02% | ||
BBD - ILF | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
More |