EWZ | ILF | EWZ / ILF | |
Gain YTD | -19.333 | -14.902 | 130% |
Net Assets | 3.72B | 1.3B | 286% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 22.00 | 24.00 | 92% |
Yield | 6.10 | 4.71 | 130% |
Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
EWZ | ILF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago85% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago86% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago86% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago88% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago87% | 11 days ago85% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago88% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | 3 days ago86% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago88% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ILF | 100% | -0.54% | ||
ITUB - ILF | 72% Closely correlated | +0.85% | ||
VALE - ILF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
SCCO - ILF | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.03% | ||
GGB - ILF | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.47% | ||
BBD - ILF | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.28% | ||
More |