EWZ | ILF | EWZ / ILF | |
Gain YTD | 19.680 | 19.082 | 103% |
Net Assets | 3.49B | 1.47B | 237% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.48 | 123% |
Turnover | 22.00 | 7.00 | 314% |
Yield | 7.77 | 6.61 | 118% |
Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
EWZ | ILF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 4 days ago84% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago89% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago80% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago88% | 4 days ago84% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago87% | 4 days ago83% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago88% | 4 days ago86% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago90% | 21 days ago86% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago76% | 4 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago86% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWZ has been closely correlated with XP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWZ jumps, then XP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ILF | 100% | +0.65% | ||
ITUB - ILF | 72% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
GGB - ILF | 70% Closely correlated | +0.38% | ||
VALE - ILF | 68% Closely correlated | -2.56% | ||
BSAC - ILF | 68% Closely correlated | +0.86% | ||
NU - ILF | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.21% | ||
More |