Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EXHAX vs GWPAX
EXHAX vs GWPAX Comparison
Open Charts EXHAX vs GWPAX
EXHAX vs GWPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXHAX vs. GWPAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXHAX is a Buy and GWPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GWPAX has more cash in the bank: 28.2B vs. EXHAX (396M). EXHAX pays higher dividends than GWPAX: EXHAX (0.62) vs GWPAX (0.34). EXHAX was incepted earlier than GWPAX: EXHAX (31 years) vs GWPAX (14 years). EXHAX (1.11) is less costly to investors than GWPAX (0.71). EXHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. GWPAX (1.00). GWPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXHAX: GWPAX (250) vs EXHAX (2000). GWPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.16 vs. EXHAX (1.71). GWPAX return over 5 years is better than : 21.85 vs. EXHAX (-5.97).
| EXHAX | GWPAX | EXHAX / GWPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.71 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.71 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.454 | 8.463 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 396M | 28.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.34 | 185% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.71 | 11.16 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.17 | 48.64 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.97 | 21.85 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.67 | 110.69 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement