Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EXHAX vs RGSFX
EXHAX vs RGSFX Comparison
Open Charts EXHAX vs RGSFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
Price$26.85
Change+$0.07 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets439.81M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R5E
Price$29.37
Change+$0.11 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.04B
EXHAX vs RGSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXHAX vs. RGSFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXHAX is a Hold and RGSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGSFX has more cash in the bank: 24B vs. EXHAX (440M). EXHAX pays higher dividends than RGSFX: EXHAX (0.57) vs RGSFX (0.54). EXHAX was incepted earlier than RGSFX: EXHAX (30 years) vs RGSFX (10 years). EXHAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RGSFX (0.52). RGSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXHAX: RGSFX (250) vs EXHAX (2000). RGSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.24 vs. EXHAX (0.52). RGSFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.57 vs. EXHAX (9.71).
| EXHAX | RGSFX | EXHAX / RGSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.52 | 212% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.52 | 212% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.206 | 15.949 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 440M | 24B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.54 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.52 | 10.24 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.87 | 50.38 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.71 | 34.57 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.75 | 92.57 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers