Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EXHAX vs RGSFX
EXHAX vs RGSFX Comparison
Open Charts EXHAX vs RGSFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
Price$27.12
Change+$0.06 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets461.99M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R5E
Price$29.99
Change+$0.05 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.59B
EXHAX vs RGSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXHAX vs. RGSFX commentary
Oct 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXHAX is a StrongBuy and RGSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGSFX has more cash in the bank: 24.6B vs. EXHAX (462M). EXHAX (0.58) and RGSFX (0.56) have matching dividends . EXHAX was incepted earlier than RGSFX: EXHAX (30 years) vs RGSFX (10 years). EXHAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RGSFX (0.52). RGSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXHAX: RGSFX (250) vs EXHAX (2000). RGSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.19 vs. EXHAX (2.68). RGSFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.29 vs. EXHAX (18.14).
| EXHAX | RGSFX | EXHAX / RGSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.52 | 212% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.52 | 212% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.327 | 18.397 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 462M | 24.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.56 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.68 | 15.19 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.18 | 57.69 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.14 | 47.29 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.58 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers