Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EXHAX vs RGSFX
EXHAX vs RGSFX Comparison
Open Charts EXHAX vs RGSFX
EXHAX vs RGSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXHAX vs. RGSFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXHAX is a Buy and RGSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGSFX has more cash in the bank: 28.1B vs. EXHAX (390M). EXHAX pays higher dividends than RGSFX: EXHAX (0.61) vs RGSFX (0.49). EXHAX was incepted earlier than RGSFX: EXHAX (31 years) vs RGSFX (11 years). EXHAX (1.11) is less costly to investors than RGSFX (0.51). EXHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. RGSFX (1.00). RGSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXHAX: RGSFX (250) vs EXHAX (2000). RGSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.89 vs. EXHAX (-0.92). RGSFX return over 5 years is better than : 21.05 vs. EXHAX (-6.99).
| EXHAX | RGSFX | EXHAX / RGSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.51 | 216% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.51 | 218% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.573 | 10.322 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 390M | 28.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.49 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.92 | 7.89 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.13 | 56.38 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.99 | 21.05 | -33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.14 | 115.23 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement