Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EXHAX vs RGSFX
EXHAX vs RGSFX Comparison
Open Charts EXHAX vs RGSFX
EXHAX vs RGSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXHAX vs. RGSFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXHAX is a Hold and RGSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGSFX has more cash in the bank: 28.1B vs. EXHAX (395M). RGSFX pays higher dividends than EXHAX: RGSFX (0.49) vs EXHAX (0.41). EXHAX was incepted earlier than RGSFX: EXHAX (31 years) vs RGSFX (11 years). EXHAX (1.11) is less costly to investors than RGSFX (0.51). EXHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. RGSFX (1.00). RGSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXHAX: RGSFX (250) vs EXHAX (2000). RGSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.96 vs. EXHAX (1.68). RGSFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.09 vs. EXHAX (-7.45).
| EXHAX | RGSFX | EXHAX / RGSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.51 | 216% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.51 | 218% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.939 | 11.188 | 17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 395M | 28.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.49 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.68 | 20.96 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.23 | 61.89 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.45 | 28.09 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.69 | 130.14 | 37% |