Ad is loading...
EXHAX vs RGWBX
EXHAX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts EXHAX vs RGWBX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
Price$24.32
Change+$0.10 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets436.79M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$23.18
Change+$0.18 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.59B
EXHAX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXHAX vs. RGWBX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXHAX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 19.6B vs. EXHAX (437M). EXHAX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: EXHAX (0.64) vs RGWBX (0.00). EXHAX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: EXHAX (30 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). RGWBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than EXHAX (1.17). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXHAX: RGWBX (250) vs EXHAX (2000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.39 vs. EXHAX (1.90). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 39.76 vs. EXHAX (25.66).
| EXHAX | RGWBX | EXHAX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.46 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.46 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.042 | -4.766 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 437M | 19.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.90 | 2.39 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.40 | 12.68 | -3% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.66 | 39.76 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.50 | 46.46 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...