Ad is loading...
EXHAX vs RGWBX
EXHAX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts EXHAX vs RGWBX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
Price$26.10
Change+$0.14 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets479.65M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$25.47
Change+$0.22 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.3B
EXHAX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXHAX vs. RGWBX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXHAX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 21.3B vs. EXHAX (480M). EXHAX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: EXHAX (0.67) vs RGWBX (0.08). EXHAX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: EXHAX (29 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). EXHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGWBX (1.00). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXHAX: RGWBX (250) vs EXHAX (2000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.64 vs. EXHAX (9.96). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 37.05 vs. EXHAX (22.73).
| EXHAX | RGWBX | EXHAX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.923 | 4.643 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 480M | 21.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.08 | 850% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.96 | 17.64 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.57 | 9.27 | -17% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.73 | 37.05 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.03 | 72.24 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...