Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EXHAX vs RGWBX
EXHAX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts EXHAX vs RGWBX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
Price$25.70
Change-$0.41 (-1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets466.06M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$25.58
Change-$0.32 (-1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.12B
EXHAX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXHAX vs. RGWBX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXHAX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 22.1B vs. EXHAX (466M). EXHAX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: EXHAX (0.61) vs RGWBX (0.00). EXHAX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: EXHAX (30 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). RGWBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than EXHAX (1.10). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXHAX: RGWBX (250) vs EXHAX (2000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.27 vs. EXHAX (4.85). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 41.37 vs. EXHAX (24.01).
| EXHAX | RGWBX | EXHAX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.46 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.46 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.524 | 5.094 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 466M | 22.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.85 | 6.27 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.77 | 40.13 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.01 | 41.37 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.41 | 61.94 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers