Ad is loading...
EXHAX vs RGWBX
EXHAX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts EXHAX vs RGWBX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
Price$23.71
Change-$0.87 (-3.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets444.89M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$22.24
Change-$1.14 (-4.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.83B
EXHAX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXHAX vs. RGWBX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXHAX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 19.8B vs. EXHAX (445M). EXHAX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: EXHAX (0.64) vs RGWBX (0.00). EXHAX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: EXHAX (29 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). RGWBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than EXHAX (1.17). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXHAX: RGWBX (250) vs EXHAX (2000). EXHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.76 vs. RGWBX (-0.68). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 60.83 vs. EXHAX (42.18).
| EXHAX | RGWBX | EXHAX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.46 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.46 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.601 | -3.944 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 445M | 19.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.76 | -0.68 | -112% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.66 | 0.30 | -2,214% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.18 | 60.83 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.69 | 50.77 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...