Ad is loading...
EXHAX vs RGWBX
EXHAX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts EXHAX vs RGWBX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
Price$25.57
Change+$0.22 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets467.97M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$24.58
Change+$0.29 (+1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.8B
EXHAX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXHAX vs. RGWBX commentary
Mar 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXHAX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 20.8B vs. EXHAX (468M). EXHAX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: EXHAX (0.67) vs RGWBX (0.08). EXHAX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: EXHAX (29 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). EXHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGWBX (1.00). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXHAX: RGWBX (250) vs EXHAX (2000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.06 vs. EXHAX (5.90). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 41.06 vs. EXHAX (27.96).
| EXHAX | RGWBX | EXHAX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.362 | 0.986 | 240% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 468M | 20.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.08 | 850% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.90 | 7.06 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.77 | 10.72 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.96 | 41.06 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.37 | 58.92 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers