Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EXHAX vs RGWBX
EXHAX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts EXHAX vs RGWBX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
Price$26.73
Change+$0.09 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets470.17M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$27.34
Change+$0.08 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.42B
EXHAX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXHAX vs. RGWBX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXHAX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 23.4B vs. EXHAX (470M). EXHAX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: EXHAX (0.59) vs RGWBX (0.00). EXHAX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: EXHAX (30 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). RGWBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than EXHAX (1.10). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXHAX: RGWBX (250) vs EXHAX (2000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.07 vs. EXHAX (5.70). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 41.05 vs. EXHAX (19.89).
| EXHAX | RGWBX | EXHAX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.46 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.46 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.006 | 12.325 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 470M | 23.4B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.70 | 15.07 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.87 | 43.49 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.89 | 41.05 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.75 | 75.41 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers