Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EXHAX vs RGWBX
EXHAX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts EXHAX vs RGWBX
EXHAX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXHAX vs. RGWBX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXHAX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 28.2B vs. EXHAX (396M). EXHAX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: EXHAX (0.62) vs RGWBX (0.00). EXHAX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: EXHAX (31 years) vs RGWBX (14 years). RGWBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than EXHAX (1.11). EXHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. RGWBX (1.00). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXHAX: RGWBX (250) vs EXHAX (2000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.02 vs. EXHAX (1.71). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 16.76 vs. EXHAX (-5.97).
| EXHAX | RGWBX | EXHAX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.46 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.46 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.454 | 7.983 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 396M | 28.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.71 | 10.02 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.17 | 44.59 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.97 | 16.76 | -36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.67 | 99.90 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement