Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EXHAX vs RGWBX
EXHAX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts EXHAX vs RGWBX
EXHAX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EXHAX vs. RGWBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXHAX is a Hold and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 28.1B vs. EXHAX (395M). EXHAX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: EXHAX (0.41) vs RGWBX (0.00). EXHAX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: EXHAX (31 years) vs RGWBX (14 years). RGWBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than EXHAX (1.11). EXHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. RGWBX (1.00). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EXHAX: RGWBX (250) vs EXHAX (2000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.55 vs. EXHAX (1.68). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 21.80 vs. EXHAX (-7.45).
| EXHAX | RGWBX | EXHAX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.46 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.46 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.939 | 10.704 | 18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 395M | 28.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.68 | 19.55 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.23 | 56.68 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.45 | 21.80 | -34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.69 | 116.72 | 42% |