EYPT
Price
$12.25
Change
-$0.61 (-4.74%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.03B
2 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KROS
Price
$9.95
Change
-$0.12 (-1.19%)
Updated
Aug 3, 10:34 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
199.3M
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EYPT vs KROS

EYPT vs KROS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 28, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? EyePoint Pharmaceuticals (EYPT) vs. Keros Therapeutics (KROS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • EyePoint Pharmaceuticals (EYPT) and Keros Therapeutics (KROS) are both clinical-stage biopharmaceutical companies, but they target entirely different therapeutic areas — retinal diseases versus hematological and musculoskeletal disorders.
  • EYPT is approaching critical binary catalysts with Phase 3 topline data for its lead asset DURAVYU expected in August and October 2026, while KROS is navigating a post-partnership transition.
  • Market capitalization diverges sharply: EYPT holds a market cap of approximately $1.02 billion, while KROS sits near $200 million, reflecting differing market perceptions of their respective pipeline values.
  • Analyst sentiment leans notably more bullish for EYPT (consensus Moderate Buy, with price targets up to $68) compared to KROS (consensus Hold, average target around $20).
  • Both companies carry substantial clinical-stage risk, but EYPT faces more immediate, high-impact catalysts, while KROS is positioned for a longer development runway.

Introduction

Clinical-stage biotechnology stocks present a unique challenge for traders and investors: enormous potential upside paired with binary risk. EyePoint Pharmaceuticals and Keros Therapeutics both occupy this high-stakes category, yet they differ meaningfully in therapeutic focus, market structure, and near-term catalyst profiles. EyePoint is pursuing a single-asset strategy centered on DURAVYU, a sustained-release treatment for wet age-related macular degeneration (wet AMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME). Keros, by contrast, is advancing a diversified pipeline built around the TGF-ß (transforming growth factor-beta) protein family, targeting diseases including Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). This comparison examines how these two names stack up across key dimensions relevant to active market participants.

EYPT Overview and Recent Performance

EyePoint Pharmaceuticals is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Watertown, Massachusetts, focused on developing sustained-release therapies for serious retinal diseases. The company's lead product candidate, DURAVYU (vorolanib in its proprietary Durasert E technology), is currently being evaluated in two pivotal Phase 3 trials — LUGANO and LUCIA — for wet AMD, with topline data anticipated in August and October 2026, respectively. A separate Phase 3 program for DME is also underway.

In recent weeks, EYPT has drawn heightened analyst attention. Stifel initiated coverage with a Buy rating and a $40 price target, while Chardan Capital raised its target to $65, and Guggenheim reiterated a Buy with a $68 objective. The broader analyst consensus stands at Moderate Buy, with an average 12-month price target of approximately $44. These ratings reflect optimism about DURAVYU's multi-billion-dollar market opportunity, given that the combined U.S. branded market for wet AMD and DME exceeds $13 billion annually.

Financially, EyePoint reported Q1 2026 revenue of just $696,000 against a net loss of $84.8 million, underscoring its pre-revenue status and heavy reliance on clinical trial spending. Cash and investments stood at $223 million as of March 31, 2026, which management expects to fund operations into Q4 2027 — beyond the key Phase 3 readouts. The stock has traded in a range of roughly $9 to $19 over the past year and carries a beta of 1.74, reflecting above-average volatility. A recent federal settlement related to historical DEXYCU marketing practices, totaling approximately $4.7 million alongside a five-year Corporate Integrity Agreement, added a modest legal overhang but did not materially alter the investment thesis, which remains overwhelmingly tied to DURAVYU clinical outcomes.

KROS Overview and Recent Performance

Keros Therapeutics is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company based in Lexington, Massachusetts, specializing in the discovery and development of therapies targeting dysfunctional TGF-ß protein signaling — a pathway implicated in blood, bone, muscle, and heart disorders. The company's most advanced asset, elritercept, is partnered with Takeda Pharmaceuticals and is being developed for cytopenias in MDS and myelofibrosis. Its lead wholly owned candidate, rinvatercept (KER-065), is advancing toward Phase 2 trials for DMD and ALS.

The past year has been transformative for KROS. The company recognized significant license revenue in 2025 from its Takeda partnership, which generated a GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) net income of approximately $110 million for the first nine months of 2025. However, with elritercept-related R&D (Research and Development) expenses now borne by Takeda, Keros has returned to operating losses — posting a Q1 2026 net loss on revenue of just $367,000. The company completed a tender offer returning $375 million in excess capital to shareholders, leaving a cash position of approximately $383 million, which is expected to fund operations into the first half of 2028.

Analyst sentiment on KROS is more measured, with a consensus Hold rating and an average price target of approximately $20. Wells Fargo maintains an Overweight rating with a reduced $20 target. The stock has declined roughly 50% year-to-date and approximately 30% over the trailing twelve months, trading near the lower end of its 52-week range. Recent insider activity has included both buying — Director Jean Jacques Bienaime purchased shares in mid-July — and selling under pre-arranged 10b5-1 plans. The company appointed Anne Prener, M.D., Ph.D., to its Board of Directors in July 2026, bolstering clinical development expertise at the board level.

Trending AI Robots

Traders seeking to augment their decision-making with data-driven tools may find value in Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across diverse strategies and timeframes. Only those bots demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn placement in the curated Trending AI Robots section. These bots have delivered annualized returns ranging from approximately 34% to over 196% across various sectors and strategies, with win rates reaching as high as 72% in select categories. Each bot employs distinct trading styles — from ultra-short-term 5-minute and 15-minute agents to longer-swing 60-minute models — along with varying position sizing, risk management rules, and ticker universes. For traders evaluating stocks like EYPT and KROS, exploring the Trending AI Robots section can offer an additional quantitative perspective grounded in real-time algorithmic analysis.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When placed side by side, EyePoint and Keros reveal contrasting risk-reward profiles that appeal to fundamentally different investor mindsets. EyePoint is essentially a single-asset story: its entire near-term value proposition hinges on DURAVYU Phase 3 results. This concentration magnifies both upside and downside. A positive readout could unlock a retinal disease market worth more than $13 billion in the U.S. alone; a disappointing outcome would materially impair the investment thesis. Keros, in contrast, benefits from pipeline diversification — with elritercept de-risked through a major pharmaceutical partnership and rinvatercept targeting the high-unmet-need DMD and ALS markets.

From a market capitalization and valuation standpoint, the divergence is striking. EYPT commands roughly five times the market cap of KROS despite having lower trailing revenue, suggesting the market is pricing in a higher probability of DURAVYU success. Keros, at approximately $200 million in market cap, trades closer to the value of its net cash position, potentially implying skepticism about its pipeline prospects or a lack of near-term catalysts.

On momentum and sentiment, EYPT has attracted more bullish institutional coverage and benefits from a clear calendar of binary events in the coming months. Keros faces a quieter catalyst timeline, with rinvatercept Phase 2 data not expected until 2027. However, Keros carries a lower beta (0.97 versus 1.74), indicating lower systematic volatility — a potential advantage for risk-averse participants. In terms of financial runway, both are well-capitalized, but Keros holds a larger cash cushion relative to its market cap.

Sector exposure also differs: EyePoint operates squarely in the ophthalmic biotechnology space, competing against established anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) therapies. Keros targets hematology, neuromuscular, and rare disease markets with a novel biological mechanism. These differences in sector dynamics, competitive landscapes, and regulatory pathways mean the two stocks are likely driven by distinct risk factors, offering little natural correlation.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including analyst conviction, near-term catalyst density, relative price momentum, and market positioning, Tickeron's AI framework would likely favor EYPT over KROS in the current environment. EyePoint benefits from a clearly defined, imminent series of high-impact events — the LUGANO and LUCIA Phase 3 readouts — that provide a concrete framework for assessing risk and reward. The overwhelmingly bullish analyst consensus, price targets implying substantial upside, and the multi-billion-dollar addressable market all contribute to a more favorable probabilistic setup. Keros, while possessing a stronger balance sheet relative to its market capitalization and a diversified pipeline, currently lacks the near-term catalyst urgency that tends to attract algorithmic and momentum-driven strategies. That said, both stocks carry the irreducible uncertainty of clinical-stage biotechnology, and outcomes remain inherently unpredictable. No AI or analytical framework can eliminate that reality — only help contextualize it.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
EYPT vs. KROS commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EYPT is a Hold and KROS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (EYPT: $12.25 vs. KROS: $10.07)
Brand notoriety: EYPT and KROS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EYPT: 88% vs. KROS: 34%
Market capitalization -- EYPT: $1.03B vs. KROS: $199.3M
EYPT [@Biotechnology] is valued at $1.03B. KROS’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $199.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $121.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EYPT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKROS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EYPT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KROS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EYPT is a better buy in the long-term than KROS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EYPT’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KROS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EYPT’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • KROS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KROS is a better buy in the short-term than EYPT.

Price Growth

EYPT (@Biotechnology) experienced а +0.49% price change this week, while KROS (@Biotechnology) price change was +0.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2790.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

EYPT is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

KROS is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (-1.22% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EYPT($1.03B) has a higher market cap than KROS($199M). EYPT YTD gains are higher at: -32.950 vs. KROS (-50.540). KROS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -108.78M vs. EYPT (-267.59M). KROS has more cash in the bank: 281M vs. EYPT (223M). KROS has less debt than EYPT: KROS (16.3M) vs EYPT (20.2M). KROS has higher revenues than EYPT: KROS (33.2M) vs EYPT (7.61M).
EYPTKROSEYPT / KROS
Capitalization1.03B199M516%
EBITDA-267.59M-108.78M246%
Gain YTD-32.950-50.54065%
P/E RatioN/A4.78-
Revenue7.61M33.2M23%
Total Cash223M281M79%
Total Debt20.2M16.3M124%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EYPT vs KROS: Fundamental Ratings
EYPT
KROS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90100
SMR RATING
1..100
9996
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5977
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
20100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KROS's Valuation (47) in the null industry is in the same range as EYPT (76) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that KROS’s stock grew similarly to EYPT’s over the last 12 months.

EYPT's Profit vs Risk Rating (90) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as KROS (100) in the null industry. This means that EYPT’s stock grew similarly to KROS’s over the last 12 months.

KROS's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as EYPT (99) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that KROS’s stock grew similarly to EYPT’s over the last 12 months.

EYPT's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as KROS (77) in the null industry. This means that EYPT’s stock grew similarly to KROS’s over the last 12 months.

EYPT's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is significantly better than the same rating for KROS (100) in the null industry. This means that EYPT’s stock grew significantly faster than KROS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EYPTKROS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EYPT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KROS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PWJCX31.150.16
+0.52%
PGIM Jennison International Opps C
GGFSX24.130.05
+0.21%
Gabelli Global Financial Services A
BPAVX37.370.06
+0.16%
Boston Partners All Cap Value Inv
WFSAX28.65-0.01
-0.03%
Allspring Small Company Growth A
AMECX27.94-0.03
-0.11%
American Funds Income Fd of Amer A

EYPT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EYPT has been loosely correlated with ATHE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EYPT jumps, then ATHE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EYPT
1D Price
Change %
EYPT100%
-4.74%
ATHE - EYPT
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.56%
KROS - EYPT
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.47%
AMLX - EYPT
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.12%
SLDB - EYPT
38%
Loosely correlated
-5.06%
KYTX - EYPT
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.54%
More

KROS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KROS has been loosely correlated with MGTX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KROS jumps, then MGTX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KROS
1D Price
Change %
KROS100%
-1.47%
MGTX - KROS
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.59%
AXON - KROS
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
SANA - KROS
42%
Loosely correlated
-3.69%
VIR - KROS
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.70%
IMVT - KROS
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.18%
More