EZPW
Price
$16.67
Change
+$0.15 (+0.91%)
Updated
Aug 29, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.02B
75 days until earnings call
RM
Price
$43.75
Change
+$0.48 (+1.11%)
Updated
Aug 29, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
429.59M
66 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EZPW vs RM

Header iconEZPW vs RM Comparison
Open Charts EZPW vs RMBanner chart's image
EZ
Price$16.67
Change+$0.15 (+0.91%)
Volume$16.86K
Capitalization1.02B
REGIONAL MANAGEMENT
Price$43.75
Change+$0.48 (+1.11%)
Volume$1.32K
Capitalization429.59M
EZPW vs RM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EZPW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EZPW vs. RM commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EZPW is a Buy and RM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (EZPW: $16.52 vs. RM: $43.84)
Brand notoriety: EZPW and RM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EZPW: 58% vs. RM: 91%
Market capitalization -- EZPW: $1.02B vs. RM: $429.59M
EZPW [@Savings Banks] is valued at $1.02B. RM’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $429.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $679.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $22.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EZPW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EZPW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RM is a better buy in the long-term than EZPW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EZPW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EZPW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EZPW is a better buy in the short-term than RM.

Price Growth

EZPW (@Savings Banks) experienced а +4.23% price change this week, while RM (@Savings Banks) price change was +8.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +0.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

EZPW is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

RM is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (+0.75% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EZPW($1.02B) has a higher market cap than RM($430M). EZPW (12.81) and RM (12.67) have similar P/E ratio . EZPW YTD gains are higher at: 35.188 vs. RM (32.538). EZPW has more cash in the bank: 472M vs. RM (4.16M). EZPW has less debt than RM: EZPW (762M) vs RM (1.51B). EZPW has higher revenues than RM: EZPW (1.23B) vs RM (532M).
EZPWRMEZPW / RM
Capitalization1.02B430M236%
EBITDA187MN/A-
Gain YTD35.18832.538108%
P/E Ratio12.8112.67101%
Revenue1.23B532M232%
Total Cash472M4.16M11,352%
Total Debt762M1.51B50%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EZPW vs RM: Fundamental Ratings
EZPW
RM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2631
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
850
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4037
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8537

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RM's Valuation (40) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as EZPW (62). This means that RM’s stock grew similarly to EZPW’s over the last 12 months.

EZPW's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RM (50). This means that EZPW’s stock grew somewhat faster than RM’s over the last 12 months.

EZPW's SMR Rating (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as RM (100). This means that EZPW’s stock grew similarly to RM’s over the last 12 months.

RM's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as EZPW (40). This means that RM’s stock grew similarly to EZPW’s over the last 12 months.

RM's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as EZPW (100). This means that RM’s stock grew similarly to EZPW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EZPWRM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EZPW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SRECX13.56N/A
N/A
PGIM Select Real Estate C
GACIX49.09N/A
N/A
Gabelli Small Cap Growth I
ARSKX75.15N/A
N/A
Archer Stock
MKVEX16.74N/A
N/A
MFS International Large Cap Value R2
AUIAX35.83N/A
N/A
AB Equity Income A

EZPW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EZPW has been loosely correlated with FCFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EZPW jumps, then FCFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EZPW
1D Price
Change %
EZPW100%
+0.73%
FCFS - EZPW
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
UPBD - EZPW
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
ENVA - EZPW
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.64%
RM - EZPW
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.22%
WRLD - EZPW
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
More