EZPW
Price
$12.97
Change
-$0.16 (-1.22%)
Updated
Jun 5, 04:18 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
624.89M
55 days until earnings call
RM
Price
$27.01
Change
+$0.16 (+0.60%)
Updated
Jun 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
236.25M
55 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EZPW vs RM

Header iconEZPW vs RM Comparison
Open Charts EZPW vs RMBanner chart's image
EZ
Price$12.97
Change-$0.16 (-1.22%)
Volume$900
Capitalization624.89M
REGIONAL MANAGEMENT
Price$27.01
Change+$0.16 (+0.60%)
Volume$2.09K
Capitalization236.25M
EZPW vs RM Comparison Chart
Loading...
EZPW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EZPW vs. RM commentary
Jun 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EZPW is a Hold and RM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 05, 2025
Stock price -- (EZPW: $13.13 vs. RM: $26.85)
Brand notoriety: EZPW and RM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EZPW: 35% vs. RM: 73%
Market capitalization -- EZPW: $624.89M vs. RM: $236.25M
EZPW [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $624.89M. RM’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $236.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EZPW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EZPW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EZPW is a better buy in the long-term than RM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EZPW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EZPW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RM is a better buy in the short-term than EZPW.

Price Growth

EZPW (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +0.15% price change this week, while RM (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +1.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

EZPW is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

RM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-0.32% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EZPW($625M) has a higher market cap than RM($236M). RM (14.49) and EZPW (13.89) have similar P/E ratio . EZPW YTD gains are higher at: 7.447 vs. RM (-19.466). EZPW has more cash in the bank: 219M vs. RM (7.41M). EZPW has less debt than RM: EZPW (607M) vs RM (1.43B). EZPW has higher revenues than RM: EZPW (1.09B) vs RM (484M).
EZPWRMEZPW / RM
Capitalization625M236M265%
EBITDA168MN/A-
Gain YTD7.447-19.466-38%
P/E Ratio13.8914.4996%
Revenue1.09B484M224%
Total Cash219M7.41M2,954%
Total Debt607M1.43B42%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EZPW vs RM: Fundamental Ratings
EZPW
RM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5166
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1467
SMR RATING
1..100
649
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5877
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2087
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RM's Valuation (19) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EZPW (77). This means that RM’s stock grew somewhat faster than EZPW’s over the last 12 months.

EZPW's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RM (67). This means that EZPW’s stock grew somewhat faster than RM’s over the last 12 months.

RM's SMR Rating (9) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EZPW (64). This means that RM’s stock grew somewhat faster than EZPW’s over the last 12 months.

EZPW's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as RM (77). This means that EZPW’s stock grew similarly to RM’s over the last 12 months.

EZPW's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for RM (87). This means that EZPW’s stock grew significantly faster than RM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EZPWRM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EZPW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
COMVX4.26N/A
N/A
Comstock Capital Value AAA
CSXAX49.81N/A
N/A
Calvert US Large Cap Core Rspnb Idx A
GMXAX15.47N/A
N/A
Nationwide Mid Cap Market Idx A
CREAX9.75N/A
N/A
Columbia Real Estate Equity A
VSCOX25.16N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Small Cap Blend A

EZPW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EZPW has been loosely correlated with FCFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EZPW jumps, then FCFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EZPW
1D Price
Change %
EZPW100%
-1.35%
FCFS - EZPW
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.72%
UPBD - EZPW
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
PRAA - EZPW
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
RM - EZPW
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
WSC - EZPW
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
More