EZPW
Price
$17.90
Change
+$0.01 (+0.06%)
Updated
Nov 19 closing price
Capitalization
1.09B
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RM
Price
$36.15
Change
-$0.05 (-0.14%)
Updated
Nov 19 closing price
Capitalization
351.12M
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EZPW vs RM

Header iconEZPW vs RM Comparison
Open Charts EZPW vs RMBanner chart's image
EZ
Price$17.90
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
Volume$607.85K
Capitalization1.09B
REGIONAL MANAGEMENT
Price$36.15
Change-$0.05 (-0.14%)
Volume$41.97K
Capitalization351.12M
EZPW vs RM Comparison Chart in %
EZPW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EZPW vs. RM commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EZPW is a Hold and RM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (EZPW: $17.91 vs. RM: $36.15)
Brand notoriety: EZPW and RM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EZPW: 74% vs. RM: 103%
Market capitalization -- EZPW: $1.09B vs. RM: $351.12M
EZPW [@Savings Banks] is valued at $1.09B. RM’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $351.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $625.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $20.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EZPW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EZPW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EZPW is a better buy in the long-term than RM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EZPW’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EZPW’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RM is a better buy in the short-term than EZPW.

Price Growth

EZPW (@Savings Banks) experienced а -0.50% price change this week, while RM (@Savings Banks) price change was -7.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -3.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

EZPW is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

RM is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-3.51% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EZPW($1.09B) has a higher market cap than RM($351M). EZPW has higher P/E ratio than RM: EZPW (12.61) vs RM (8.75). EZPW YTD gains are higher at: 46.563 vs. RM (9.289). EZPW has more cash in the bank: 472M vs. RM (4.16M). EZPW has less debt than RM: EZPW (762M) vs RM (1.55B). EZPW has higher revenues than RM: EZPW (1.23B) vs RM (532M).
EZPWRMEZPW / RM
Capitalization1.09B351M311%
EBITDA187MN/A-
Gain YTD46.5639.289501%
P/E Ratio12.618.75144%
Revenue1.23B532M232%
Total Cash472M4.16M11,352%
Total Debt762M1.55B49%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EZPW vs RM: Fundamental Ratings
EZPW
RM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1371
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
666
SMR RATING
1..100
6517
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4450
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2780
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RM's Valuation (20) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EZPW (65). This means that RM’s stock grew somewhat faster than EZPW’s over the last 12 months.

EZPW's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RM (66). This means that EZPW’s stock grew somewhat faster than RM’s over the last 12 months.

RM's SMR Rating (17) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EZPW (65). This means that RM’s stock grew somewhat faster than EZPW’s over the last 12 months.

EZPW's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as RM (50). This means that EZPW’s stock grew similarly to RM’s over the last 12 months.

EZPW's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RM (80). This means that EZPW’s stock grew somewhat faster than RM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EZPWRM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EZPW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSSKX90.26N/A
N/A
Fidelity Stock Selec-Class K
FLUAX29.15N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Stk Selec Lg Cp Val A
PMIAX11.19N/A
N/A
Putnam Multi-Asset Income A
OSPSX9.74-0.01
-0.10%
Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 R6
WAFMX3.57-0.02
-0.56%
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs Inv