EZPW
Price
$29.54
Change
-$0.62 (-2.06%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.82B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SYF
Price
$72.90
Change
+$1.13 (+1.57%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
23.72B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EZPW vs SYF

EZPW vs SYF Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EZPW vs. SYF commentary
Jul 27, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EZPW is a Hold and SYF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2026
Stock price -- (EZPW: $29.54 vs. SYF: $72.90)
Brand notoriety: EZPW: Not notable vs. SYF: Notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EZPW: 58% vs. SYF: 99%
Market capitalization -- EZPW: $1.82B vs. SYF: $23.72B
EZPW [@Savings Banks] is valued at $1.82B. SYF’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $23.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $676.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $32.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EZPW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSYF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EZPW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SYF is a better buy in the long-term than EZPW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EZPW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SYF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EZPW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SYF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SYF is a better buy in the short-term than EZPW.

Price Growth

EZPW (@Savings Banks) experienced а -7.95% price change this week, while SYF (@Savings Banks) price change was -0.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -3.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

EZPW is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

SYF is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-3.44% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SYF($23.7B) has a higher market cap than EZPW($1.82B). EZPW has higher P/E ratio than SYF: EZPW (15.97) vs SYF (7.48). EZPW YTD gains are higher at: 52.111 vs. SYF (-11.910). EZPW has less debt than SYF: EZPW (799M) vs SYF (16.4B). SYF has higher revenues than EZPW: SYF (15B) vs EZPW (1.48B).
EZPWSYFEZPW / SYF
Capitalization1.82B23.7B8%
EBITDA263MN/A-
Gain YTD52.111-11.910-438%
P/E Ratio15.977.48214%
Revenue1.48B15B10%
Total Cash354MN/A-
Total Debt799M16.4B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EZPW vs SYF: Fundamental Ratings
EZPW
SYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5019
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
545
SMR RATING
1..100
585
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4058
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2265
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SYF's Valuation (40) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EZPW (73). This means that SYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EZPW’s over the last 12 months.

EZPW's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SYF (45). This means that EZPW’s stock grew somewhat faster than SYF’s over the last 12 months.

SYF's SMR Rating (5) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EZPW (58). This means that SYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EZPW’s over the last 12 months.

EZPW's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as SYF (58). This means that EZPW’s stock grew similarly to SYF’s over the last 12 months.

EZPW's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SYF (65). This means that EZPW’s stock grew somewhat faster than SYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EZPWSYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EZPW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SYF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IYK74.470.78
+1.06%
iShares US Consumer Staples ETF
VDIG62.590.34
+0.55%
Vanguard Wellington Dividend Gr Actv ETF
FJP76.59N/A
N/A
First Trust Japan AlphaDEX® ETF
KFEB30.86-0.01
-0.03%
Innovator U.S. Small Cp Pwr Buf ETF -Feb
ASHS40.80-0.81
-1.94%
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 CHN A SmCp ETF

EZPW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EZPW has been loosely correlated with FCFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EZPW jumps, then FCFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EZPW
1D Price
Change %
EZPW100%
-2.06%
FCFS - EZPW
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
UPBD - EZPW
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.94%
OPRT - EZPW
29%
Poorly correlated
+5.47%
ALLY - EZPW
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.39%
SYF - EZPW
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.57%
More