F
Price
$10.68
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 10 closing price
17 days until earnings call
MULN
Price
$2.24
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 10 closing price
Ad is loading...

F vs MULN

Header iconF vs MULN Comparison
Open Charts F vs MULNBanner chart's image
Ford Motor
Price$10.68
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$39.46M
CapitalizationN/A
Mullen Automotive
Price$2.24
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.42M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
F vs MULN Comparison Chart
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MULN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
F vs. MULN commentary
Oct 12, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is F is a StrongBuy and MULN is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 12, 2024
Stock price -- (F: $10.68 vs. MULN: $2.24)
Brand notoriety: F: Notable vs. MULN: Not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: F: 80% vs. MULN: 107%
Market capitalization -- F: $52.77B vs. MULN: $34.07M
F [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $52.77B. MULN’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $34.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $559.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $33.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

F’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMULN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • F’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MULN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, F is a better buy in the long-term than MULN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

F’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MULN’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • F’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MULN’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, F is a better buy in the short-term than MULN.

Price Growth

F (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а +2.20% price change this week, while MULN (@Motor Vehicles) price change was -9.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +3.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

F is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.

MULN is expected to report earnings on May 31, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (+3.72% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
F($52.8B) has a higher market cap than MULN($34.1M). F has higher P/E ratio than MULN: F (12.31) vs MULN (0.00). F YTD gains are higher at: -7.512 vs. MULN (-99.843). F has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11.8B vs. MULN (-686.05M). F has more cash in the bank: 40.2B vs. MULN (81.5M). MULN has less debt than F: MULN (19M) vs F (151B). F has higher revenues than MULN: F (176B) vs MULN (366K).
FMULNF / MULN
Capitalization52.8B34.1M154,839%
EBITDA11.8B-686.05M-1,720%
Gain YTD-7.512-99.8438%
P/E Ratio12.310.001,122,770%
Revenue176B366K48,087,432%
Total Cash40.2B81.5M49,325%
Total Debt151B19M794,737%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
F vs MULN: Fundamental Ratings
F
MULN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
771
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
69100
SMR RATING
1..100
74100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6298
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
77100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

F's Valuation (9) in the Motor Vehicles industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MULN (51) in the null industry. This means that F’s stock grew somewhat faster than MULN’s over the last 12 months.

F's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as MULN (100) in the null industry. This means that F’s stock grew similarly to MULN’s over the last 12 months.

F's SMR Rating (74) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as MULN (100) in the null industry. This means that F’s stock grew similarly to MULN’s over the last 12 months.

F's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Motor Vehicles industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MULN (98) in the null industry. This means that F’s stock grew somewhat faster than MULN’s over the last 12 months.

F's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as MULN (100) in the null industry. This means that F’s stock grew similarly to MULN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMULN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MULN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME20.910.41
+2.00%
GameStop Corp
SPY576.13-1.01
-0.18%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL229.04-0.50
-0.22%
Apple
BTC.X60274.500000-307.601560
-0.51%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA238.77-2.28
-0.95%
Tesla

MULN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MULN and AYRO have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MULN and AYRO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MULN
1D Price
Change %
MULN100%
-0.44%
AYRO - MULN
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.76%
LCID - MULN
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.77%
F - MULN
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
GM - MULN
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
WKHS - MULN
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
More