FA
Price
$14.28
Change
+$0.41 (+2.96%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.33B
13 days until earnings call
GHC
Price
$917.74
Change
-$3.37 (-0.37%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
3.42B
5 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FA vs GHC

Header iconFA vs GHC Comparison
Open Charts FA vs GHCBanner chart's image
First Advantage
Price$14.28
Change+$0.41 (+2.96%)
Volume$1.12M
Capitalization2.33B
Graham Holdings
Price$917.74
Change-$3.37 (-0.37%)
Volume$34.51K
Capitalization3.42B
FA vs GHC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FA vs. GHC commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FA is a Buy and GHC is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (FA: $14.28 vs. GHC: $917.74)
Brand notoriety: FA and GHC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FA: 79% vs. GHC: 142%
Market capitalization -- FA: $2.33B vs. GHC: $3.42B
FA [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $2.33B. GHC’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $3.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGHC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GHC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GHC is a better buy in the long-term than FA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FA’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GHC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GHC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GHC is a better buy in the short-term than FA.

Price Growth

FA (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +6.01% price change this week, while GHC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was +1.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +4.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

FA is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

GHC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+4.87% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GHC($3.42B) has a higher market cap than FA($2.33B). FA has higher P/E ratio than GHC: FA (61.81) vs GHC (17.25). GHC YTD gains are higher at: 5.667 vs. FA (-23.759). GHC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 665M vs. FA (211M). GHC has more cash in the bank: 867M vs. FA (214M). FA has less debt than GHC: FA (568M) vs GHC (1.25B). GHC has higher revenues than FA: GHC (4.42B) vs FA (764M).
FAGHCFA / GHC
Capitalization2.33B3.42B68%
EBITDA211M665M32%
Gain YTD-23.7595.667-419%
P/E Ratio61.8117.25358%
Revenue764M4.42B17%
Total Cash214M867M25%
Total Debt568M1.25B45%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GHC: Fundamental Ratings
GHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
68
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3
SMR RATING
1..100
50
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FAGHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RNWAX75.160.82
+1.10%
American Funds New World R1
LRSFX13.07N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value F
MCVAX10.25N/A
N/A
Transamerica Mid Cap Value Opps A
ABLYX24.91N/A
N/A
American Beacon Large Cap Value Y
FBBAX25.16N/A
N/A
First Foundation Total Return A

GHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GHC has been loosely correlated with LOPE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GHC jumps, then LOPE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GHC
1D Price
Change %
GHC100%
-0.37%
LOPE - GHC
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
MSA - GHC
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.64%
ATGE - GHC
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
BCO - GHC
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
AZZ - GHC
55%
Loosely correlated
+4.00%
More