FAC
Price
$9.96
Change
-$0.27 (-2.64%)
Updated
Jul 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.1B
58 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VRT
Price
$318.43
Change
+$17.89 (+5.95%)
Updated
Jul 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
115.44B
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FAC vs VRT

FAC vs VRT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FAC vs. VRT commentary
Jul 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAC is a Hold and VRT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2026
Stock price -- (FAC: $10.23 vs. VRT: $300.53)
Brand notoriety: FAC and VRT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electrical Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FAC: 24% vs. VRT: 92%
Market capitalization -- FAC: $1.1B vs. VRT: $115.44B
FAC [@Electrical Products] is valued at $1.1B. VRT’s [@Electrical Products] market capitalization is $115.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electrical Products] industry ranges from $300.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electrical Products] industry is $6.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVRT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VRT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, VRT is a better buy in the long-term than FAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FAC’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FAC’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • VRT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FAC is a better buy in the short-term than VRT.

Price Growth

FAC (@Electrical Products) experienced а -6.87% price change this week, while VRT (@Electrical Products) price change was -7.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was -2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

FAC is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.

VRT is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electrical Products (-2.32% weekly)

The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VRT($115B) has a higher market cap than FAC($1.1B). VRT YTD gains are higher at: 85.583 vs. FAC (-0.583).
FACVRTFAC / VRT
Capitalization1.1B115B1%
EBITDAN/A2.32B-
Gain YTD-0.58385.583-1%
P/E RatioN/A89.94-
RevenueN/A10.8B-
Total CashN/A1.73B-
Total DebtN/A3.27B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FAC vs VRT: Fundamental Ratings
FAC
VRT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10012
SMR RATING
1..100
10022
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5238
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10027
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FAC's Valuation (27) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VRT (91) in the null industry. This means that FAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than VRT’s over the last 12 months.

VRT's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FAC (100) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that VRT’s stock grew significantly faster than FAC’s over the last 12 months.

VRT's SMR Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FAC (100) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that VRT’s stock grew significantly faster than FAC’s over the last 12 months.

VRT's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as FAC (52) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that VRT’s stock grew similarly to FAC’s over the last 12 months.

VRT's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FAC (100) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that VRT’s stock grew significantly faster than FAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FACVRT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
10%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
6%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
12%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VRT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GIDHX9.110.13
+1.45%
Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Div & Prem Instl
RIDCX27.470.30
+1.10%
American Funds Income Fd of Amer R-3
AAAAX13.140.13
+1.00%
DWS RREEF Real Assets A
ETIDX22.37-0.26
-1.15%
Eventide Dividend Growth I
HNCJX23.46-0.28
-1.18%
Hartford International Growth I

FAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FAC and VRT have been poorly correlated (+-3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FAC and VRT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAC
1D Price
Change %
FAC100%
-7.21%
VRT - FAC
-3%
Poorly correlated
-3.50%
NVT - FAC
-4%
Poorly correlated
-4.90%
BE - FAC
-8%
Poorly correlated
-6.43%
HUBB - FAC
-10%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%