Advertisement
FACO vs HIPO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FACO is a Hold and HIPO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FACO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHIPO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FACO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- HIPO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FACO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HIPO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FACO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- HIPO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FACO (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а -4.51% price change this week, while HIPO (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -1.38% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was -0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.86%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.96%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Insurance (-0.20% weekly)Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.
@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.22% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| FACO | HIPO | FACO / HIPO | |
| Capitalization | 125M | 832M | 15% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.211 | 24.169 | 51% |
| P/E Ratio | 5.48 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 522M | 425M | 123% |
| Total Cash | 401M | 454M | 88% |
| Total Debt | 45.2M | 54M | 84% |
FACO | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FACO | HIPO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 72% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 67% |
Advertisement
FACO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FACO and HIPO have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FACO and HIPO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FACO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FACO | 100% | +0.29% | ||
| HIPO - FACO | 17% Poorly correlated | +0.97% | ||
| TRRSF - FACO | 9% Poorly correlated | -1.23% | ||
| LCSHF - FACO | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BZLYF - FACO | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.90% | ||
| JTGPF - FACO | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
HIPO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIPO has been loosely correlated with LMND. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HIPO jumps, then LMND could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HIPO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIPO | 100% | +0.97% | ||
| LMND - HIPO | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| ROOT - HIPO | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.36% | ||
| AIZ - HIPO | 42% Loosely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| FNF - HIPO | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| ORI - HIPO | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.86% | ||
More | ||||