Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FADCX vs RERFX
FADCX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts FADCX vs RERFX
FADCX vs RERFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FADCX vs. RERFX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FADCX is a Buy and RERFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. FADCX (1.81B). RERFX pays higher dividends than FADCX: RERFX (2.67) vs FADCX (0.70). FADCX was incepted earlier than RERFX: FADCX (27 years) vs RERFX (24 years). FADCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). FADCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RERFX (35.00). FADCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERFX: FADCX (0) vs RERFX (250). RERFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.21 vs. FADCX (5.84). RERFX return over 5 years is better than : -0.27 vs. FADCX (-1.37).
| FADCX | RERFX | FADCX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.52 | 358% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.52 | 358% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.244 | 11.704 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 137B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 2.67 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.84 | 15.21 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.13 | 33.52 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.37 | -0.27 | 504% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.16 | 62.47 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement