FAF
Price
$62.57
Change
+$2.87 (+4.81%)
Updated
Apr 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.16B
89 days until earnings call
HIPO
Price
$24.54
Change
+$0.39 (+1.61%)
Updated
Apr 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
444.16M
Ad is loading...

FAF vs HIPO

Header iconFAF vs HIPO Comparison
Open Charts FAF vs HIPOBanner chart's image
First American Financial
Price$62.57
Change+$2.87 (+4.81%)
Volume$14.34K
Capitalization6.16B
Hippo Holdings
Price$24.54
Change+$0.39 (+1.61%)
Volume$2.16K
Capitalization444.16M
FAF vs HIPO Comparison Chart
Loading...
FAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HIPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FAF vs. HIPO commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAF is a Hold and HIPO is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (FAF: $59.70 vs. HIPO: $24.15)
Brand notoriety: FAF and HIPO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FAF: 175% vs. HIPO: 60%
Market capitalization -- FAF: $6.16B vs. HIPO: $444.16M
FAF [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $6.16B. HIPO’s [@Specialty Insurance] market capitalization is $444.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $14.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $3.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHIPO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HIPO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FAF is a better buy in the long-term than HIPO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FAF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HIPO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FAF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HIPO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FAF is a better buy in the short-term than HIPO.

Price Growth

FAF (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а +1.32% price change this week, while HIPO (@Specialty Insurance) price change was -1.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was +1.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

FAF is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

HIPO is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (+1.90% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAF($6.16B) has a higher market cap than HIPO($444M). FAF has higher P/E ratio than HIPO: FAF (28.86) vs HIPO (0.45). FAF YTD gains are higher at: -3.573 vs. HIPO (-9.787). FAF has more cash in the bank: 3.66B vs. HIPO (401M). HIPO has less debt than FAF: HIPO (14.8M) vs FAF (2.19B). FAF has higher revenues than HIPO: FAF (6B) vs HIPO (210M).
FAFHIPOFAF / HIPO
Capitalization6.16B444M1,387%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-3.573-9.78737%
P/E Ratio28.860.456,359%
Revenue6B210M2,856%
Total Cash3.66B401M913%
Total Debt2.19B14.8M14,824%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FAF: Fundamental Ratings
FAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
57
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
47
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FAFHIPO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HIPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TMFE25.170.37
+1.48%
Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 ETF
KVLE23.620.27
+1.15%
KraneShares Value Line® Dyn Div Eq ETF
FXZ51.850.30
+0.58%
First Trust Materials AlphaDEX® ETF
ASGI18.480.01
+0.05%
abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund
VNQI42.35-0.38
-0.89%
Vanguard Global ex-US Real Est ETF

FAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAF has been closely correlated with FNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FAF jumps, then FNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAF
1D Price
Change %
FAF100%
+2.37%
FNF - FAF
83%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
MTG - FAF
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
NMIH - FAF
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
RDN - FAF
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
ESNT - FAF
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
More

HIPO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIPO has been loosely correlated with FNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HIPO jumps, then FNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HIPO
1D Price
Change %
HIPO100%
-1.55%
FNF - HIPO
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
TIPT - HIPO
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
EIG - HIPO
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
FAF - HIPO
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.37%
MTG - HIPO
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
More