ESNT
Price
$65.96
Change
-$0.50 (-0.75%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
6.08B
4 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FAF
Price
$74.99
Change
-$0.54 (-0.71%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
7.66B
79 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ESNT vs FAF

ESNT vs FAF Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Essent Group Ltd. (ESNT) vs. First American Financial Corporation (FAF) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Essent Group Ltd. (ESNT) and First American Financial Corporation (FAF) both operate in the U.S. housing finance ecosystem but serve fundamentally different segments — mortgage insurance versus title and settlement services.
  • FAF has delivered stronger recent momentum, with a one-month gain of approximately 11.7% and a year-to-date advance of roughly 24.3%, compared to ESNT's 6.6% monthly and 2.4% year-to-date returns.
  • ESNT trades at a notably lower valuation, with a trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio near 9.4 and a price-to-book ratio around 1.06, versus FAF's trailing P/E near 10.4.
  • Both companies maintain disciplined capital return programs, with ESNT raising its dividend for six consecutive years and FAF recently increasing its annual dividend to $2.20 per share.
  • The housing market backdrop — characterized by elevated mortgage rates and affordability constraints — affects both stocks but through different transmission channels, creating distinct risk-reward profiles.
  • ESNT faces credit normalization headwinds as default rates edge higher, while FAF benefits from record commercial title revenue and AI-driven operational efficiencies.

Introduction

Investors tracking the U.S. housing and mortgage finance landscape often encounter two prominent names with overlapping exposure but sharply different business models: ESNT (Essent Group Ltd.) and FAF (First American Financial Corporation). Essent is a leading private mortgage insurer, providing credit protection on low-down-payment residential loans, while First American is a premier title insurance and settlement services provider with a history spanning more than 135 years. Although both companies are tethered to housing market activity, their earnings drivers, risk exposures, and growth trajectories diverge in ways that matter for portfolio construction. This comparison examines how these two stocks stack up across performance, valuation, and strategic positioning to help market participants make more informed assessments.

ESNT Overview and Recent Performance

ESNT, headquartered in Hamilton, Bermuda, is a holding company whose subsidiaries provide private mortgage insurance, reinsurance, and title insurance and settlement services to the U.S. housing finance industry. Mortgage insurance remains the core engine, with insurance in force standing at approximately $248.4 billion at year-end 2025. In the first quarter of 2026, Essent reported net income of $171.8 million, or $1.82 per diluted share, supported by strong persistency rates and investment income.

Over recent weeks, ESNT has attracted attention for its high mortgage insurance persistency rate of 84.7% in Q1 2026, a metric that benefits from nearly half of its in-force book carrying note rates at or below 5.5% — meaning borrowers have little incentive to refinance. This dynamic provides premium stability even as new origination activity remains constrained by elevated mortgage rates. However, credit normalization has emerged as a countervailing force: Essent's default rate rose to 2.54% in Q1 2026 from 2.12% in Q2 2025, and loss reserves increased to $486 million. The company is also expanding into non-mortgage property and casualty (P&C) reinsurance through its Essent Re subsidiary, a diversification effort that management expects will have an immaterial near-term earnings impact but could broaden future revenue streams. With a beta of 0.76 and a trailing P/E near 9.4, ESNT currently carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy) and a Value Score of A, reflecting its valuation appeal amid a balanced risk backdrop.

FAF Overview and Recent Performance

FAF, based in Santa Ana, California, is one of the largest title insurance and settlement services providers in the United States, with additional operations spanning data products, valuation services, mortgage subservicing, home warranty, and banking and trust services. The company generated $7.5 billion in total revenue in 2025 and has been named one of Fortune's 100 Best Companies to Work For for eleven consecutive years.

FAF's recent performance has been notably robust. In its second quarter of 2026, the company reported operating earnings of $2.08 per share, beating consensus estimates by approximately 15.6%, while total revenue climbed 15% year-over-year to $2.1 billion. Commercial title revenue surged 34% to $314 million, driven by record average revenue per order of $19,980 and strong demand across data centers, energy, and industrial projects. The title segment's adjusted pretax margin expanded to 15.7%, reflecting operating leverage and the benefit of higher investment income, which rose 11% year-over-year. FAF is also deploying artificial intelligence across its platform — including its Endpoint and SEQUOIA systems — to automate title decisioning and escrow workflows, with early results showing a 97% reduction in form update processing time. The stock's year-to-date gain of approximately 24.3% and one-month advance of roughly 11.7% reflect broad investor confidence. Analysts' average price target of $85.80 suggests additional potential upside, though the stock's Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) signals a more measured near-term outlook.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking to complement their own analysis with data-driven automation, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across multiple timeframes and strategies, but only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn a place in this featured section. The bots span diverse trading styles — from swing trading and trend following to dip-buying and breakout strategies — and operate across intervals ranging from 5-minute to 60-minute cycles. In recent months, select Tickeron AI agents have delivered annualized returns exceeding 100% in sectors such as semiconductors, infrastructure, and space technology, with win rates reaching above 70% in some strategies. Each bot maintains fully transparent statistics including closed trade profit-and-loss (P&L), Sharpe ratio, and trade history. To explore the full lineup and find a bot that matches your trading style, visit the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

While both ESNT and FAF are tied to U.S. housing, their exposure channels differ meaningfully. Essent generates revenue primarily from mortgage insurance premiums — recurring payments that persist as long as the underlying loans remain active. This creates a relatively predictable earnings stream, amplified by the current high-persistency environment. First American, by contrast, is transaction-driven: its revenue depends on real estate purchase and refinance volumes, making it more cyclically sensitive but also capable of sharper rebounds when housing activity accelerates.

On valuation, ESNT appears cheaper across multiple metrics. Its price-to-book ratio of approximately 1.06 sits well below the mortgage insurance peer group average near 1.5x, while its trailing P/E of 9.35 also compares favorably. FAF trades at a price-to-book of roughly 1.36 and a trailing P/E near 10.4 — still reasonable by historical standards but less discounted than its insurance peer. However, FAF's stronger growth trajectory and momentum offer a counterbalance. Consensus estimates project 2026 EPS growth of 11.6% for FAF, compared to roughly 5% for ESNT, and FAF's expected long-term earnings growth rate of 15.2% meaningfully exceeds the industry average.

Risk profiles also diverge. ESNT's primary risk is credit normalization — as default rates rise, provisions for losses and loss adjustment expenses consume a larger share of premium revenue. FAF faces volume risk: sustained mortgage rate elevation and housing affordability pressure could continue to suppress residential purchase and refinance activity, though its growing commercial title business provides an important offset. Both companies maintain strong balance sheets: Essent holds $1.1 billion in holding-company liquidity with PMIERs (Private Mortgage Insurer Eligibility Requirements) sufficiency of 174%, while FAF's debt-to-capital ratio stands at 31.4%, or 21.5% excluding secured financings.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trends, momentum signals, and relative positioning, an AI-driven assessment would likely tilt toward FAF in the current environment. The stock's superior recent momentum — reflected in its 24.3% year-to-date gain versus ESNT's 2.4% — combines with a commercial title segment posting record revenues, expanding pretax margins, and a robust pipeline across data centers, energy, and industrial projects. First American's deployment of AI across its operations also signals a forward-leaning operational posture that aligns with evolving market expectations. That said, ESNT may appeal more to value-oriented investors given its compressed valuation multiples, strong capital returns, and the cushion provided by high persistency rates. The AI verdict is probabilistic, not definitive: FAF appears better positioned for near-term relative outperformance, while ESNT offers a more defensive, capital-backed value proposition that could prove advantageous if housing credit conditions stabilize and origination volumes eventually recover.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ESNT vs. FAF commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESNT is a Hold and FAF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (ESNT: $65.96 vs. FAF: $74.99)
Brand notoriety: ESNT and FAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ESNT: 55% vs. FAF: 61%
Market capitalization -- ESNT: $6.08B vs. FAF: $7.66B
ESNT [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $6.08B. FAF’s [@Specialty Insurance] market capitalization is $7.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $13.89B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $4.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ESNT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ESNT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ESNT is a better buy in the long-term than FAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ESNT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FAF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ESNT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FAF is a better buy in the short-term than ESNT.

Price Growth

ESNT (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а +0.32% price change this week, while FAF (@Specialty Insurance) price change was -0.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was -1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

ESNT is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2026.

FAF is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (-1.26% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAF($7.66B) has a higher market cap than ESNT($6.08B). FAF has higher P/E ratio than ESNT: FAF (10.40) vs ESNT (9.38). FAF YTD gains are higher at: 24.073 vs. ESNT (2.702). ESNT has more cash in the bank: 6.18B vs. FAF (2.73B). ESNT has less debt than FAF: ESNT (496M) vs FAF (2.79B). FAF has higher revenues than ESNT: FAF (7.98B) vs ESNT (1.31B).
ESNTFAFESNT / FAF
Capitalization6.08B7.66B79%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.70224.07311%
P/E Ratio9.3810.4090%
Revenue1.31B7.98B16%
Total Cash6.18B2.73B226%
Total Debt496M2.79B18%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ESNT vs FAF: Fundamental Ratings
ESNT
FAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9273
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2458
SMR RATING
1..100
6875
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4642
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3498
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FAF's Valuation (17) in the Specialty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ESNT (75). This means that FAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ESNT’s over the last 12 months.

ESNT's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Specialty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FAF (58). This means that ESNT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FAF’s over the last 12 months.

ESNT's SMR Rating (68) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as FAF (75). This means that ESNT’s stock grew similarly to FAF’s over the last 12 months.

FAF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as ESNT (46). This means that FAF’s stock grew similarly to ESNT’s over the last 12 months.

ESNT's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Specialty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FAF (98). This means that ESNT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ESNTFAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ESNT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BAH69.721.41
+2.06%
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp
SZZLU10.46N/A
N/A
Sizzle Acquisition Corp II
AIRS4.81-0.04
-0.82%
AirSculpt Technologies
PAX10.82-0.15
-1.37%
Patria Investments Limited
PHUN2.11-0.03
-1.40%
Phunware

ESNT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESNT has been closely correlated with NMIH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ESNT jumps, then NMIH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESNT
1D Price
Change %
ESNT100%
-0.75%
NMIH - ESNT
85%
Closely correlated
+1.98%
MTG - ESNT
84%
Closely correlated
-1.35%
ACT - ESNT
79%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
RDN - ESNT
76%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
AIZ - ESNT
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
More