Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAFCX vs FSLBX
FAFCX vs FSLBX Comparison
Open Charts FAFCX vs FSLBX
FAFCX vs FSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAFCX vs. FSLBX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAFCX is a Hold and FSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 872M vs. FAFCX (637M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than FAFCX: FSLBX (0.76) vs FAFCX (0.56). FAFCX was incepted earlier than FSLBX: FAFCX (29 years) vs FSLBX (41 years). FAFCX (1.75) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). FAFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FSLBX (10.00). FAFCX (0) and FSLBX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FAFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.18 vs. FSLBX (-15.47). FSLBX (50.92) and FAFCX (49.34) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FAFCX | FSLBX | FAFCX / FSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.66 | 265% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.66 | 265% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.737 | -9.916 | -78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 637M | 872M | 73% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.76 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.18 | -15.47 | -40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.11 | 46.35 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.34 | 50.92 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 172.10 | 211.37 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement