Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAFCX vs FSLBX
FAFCX vs FSLBX Comparison
Open Charts FAFCX vs FSLBX
FAFCX vs FSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAFCX vs. FSLBX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAFCX is a Buy and FSLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 941M vs. FAFCX (609M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than FAFCX: FSLBX (0.72) vs FAFCX (0.59). FAFCX was incepted earlier than FSLBX: FAFCX (29 years) vs FSLBX (41 years). FAFCX (1.75) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). FAFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FSLBX (10.00). FAFCX (0) and FSLBX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FAFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.05 vs. FSLBX (-8.03). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 50.88 vs. FAFCX (34.96).
| FAFCX | FSLBX | FAFCX / FSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.66 | 265% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.66 | 265% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.674 | -12.268 | -14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 609M | 941M | 65% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.72 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.05 | -8.03 | -63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.54 | 55.50 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.96 | 50.88 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 168.79 | 215.83 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers