Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAFDX vs FSLBX
FAFDX vs FSLBX Comparison
Open Charts FAFDX vs FSLBX
FAFDX vs FSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAFDX vs. FSLBX commentary
Aug 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAFDX is a StrongBuy and FSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 942M vs. FAFDX (677M). FAFDX pays higher dividends than FSLBX: FAFDX (1.17) vs FSLBX (0.69). FAFDX was incepted earlier than FSLBX: FAFDX (30 years) vs FSLBX (41 years). FAFDX (1.00) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). FAFDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FSLBX (10.00). FAFDX (0) and FSLBX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FAFDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.16 vs. FSLBX (-11.67). FAFDX (50.66) and FSLBX (48.52) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FAFDX | FSLBX | FAFDX / FSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.66 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.66 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.371 | -6.726 | -169% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 677M | 942M | 72% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.69 | 170% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.16 | -11.67 | -113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.99 | 56.45 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.66 | 48.52 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 198.21 | 218.01 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers