Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAFGX vs LGLSX
FAFGX vs LGLSX Comparison
Open Charts FAFGX vs LGLSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F2
Price$84.51
Change-$1.71 (-1.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.02B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R4
Price$52.50
Change-$1.63 (-3.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.66B
FAFGX vs LGLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAFGX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. LGLSX (7.66B). FAFGX pays higher dividends than LGLSX: FAFGX (0.49) vs LGLSX (0.00). FAFGX was incepted earlier than LGLSX: FAFGX (5 years) vs LGLSX (10 years). LGLSX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FAFGX (0.40). LGLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FAFGX (25.00). LGLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FAFGX: LGLSX (0) vs FAFGX (250). LGLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.25 vs. FAFGX (4.82). FAFGX return over 5 years is better than : 34.00 vs. LGLSX (18.45).
| FAFGX | LGLSX | FAFGX / LGLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.90 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.90 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.726 | 14.537 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 7.66B | 4,294% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.82 | 14.25 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.24 | 110.05 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.00 | 18.45 | 184% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 126.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement