Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAFGX vs WMKGX
FAFGX vs WMKGX Comparison
Open Charts FAFGX vs WMKGX
FAFGX vs WMKGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAFGX vs. WMKGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAFGX is a Buy and WMKGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAFGX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. WMKGX (367M). FAFGX pays higher dividends than WMKGX: FAFGX (0.43) vs WMKGX (0.00). FAFGX was incepted earlier than WMKGX: FAFGX (6 years) vs WMKGX (29 years). WMKGX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FAFGX (0.38). FAFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WMKGX (25.00). FAFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMKGX: FAFGX (250) vs WMKGX (1000). FAFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.37 vs. WMKGX (-0.28). FAFGX return over 5 years is better than : 15.12 vs. WMKGX (-8.53).
| FAFGX | WMKGX | FAFGX / WMKGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 1.14 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 1.14 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.256 | 14.182 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 367M | 96,185% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.37 | -0.28 | -135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.11 | 17.57 | 251% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.12 | -8.53 | -177% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 46.37 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement